<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 0.8.6 &#8211; armor changes, update</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Siemiaszek</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Siemiaszek]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Jun 2013 12:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What application do you use, to see the models the way like on screenies? With armor thinkness legend and whatnot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What application do you use, to see the models the way like on screenies? With armor thinkness legend and whatnot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Draco Argentum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-411</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Draco Argentum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 23:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-411</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With the E100 changes apparently it is non historical for a reason. In the original tests those areas above the tracks were getting overmatched and auto penned by all 91mm+ guns. Since that part of the tank slopes very slightly you can hit it from the front. More detail here:

http://forum.wotlabs.net/index.php?/topic/618-e-100-armor-nerf/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With the E100 changes apparently it is non historical for a reason. In the original tests those areas above the tracks were getting overmatched and auto penned by all 91mm+ guns. Since that part of the tank slopes very slightly you can hit it from the front. More detail here:</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.wotlabs.net/index.php?/topic/618-e-100-armor-nerf/" rel="nofollow">http://forum.wotlabs.net/index.php?/topic/618-e-100-armor-nerf/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: well</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-396</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[well]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 18:36:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-396</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It is just being corrected for &quot;historical inaccuracies.&quot; The fact that it gets nerfed is only a coincidence. However, 8.6 should be an overall buff for heavy armored tanks such as E-100.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is just being corrected for &#8220;historical inaccuracies.&#8221; The fact that it gets nerfed is only a coincidence. However, 8.6 should be an overall buff for heavy armored tanks such as E-100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavitz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 14:43:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically the e100 isn&#039;t nerfed either, so i can&#039;t really call out &quot;bias&quot; on this one, though i do believe that the t62 and 268 are way too imba - which can be &quot;bias&quot; all the way ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically the e100 isn&#8217;t nerfed either, so i can&#8217;t really call out &#8220;bias&#8221; on this one, though i do believe that the t62 and 268 are way too imba &#8211; which can be &#8220;bias&#8221; all the way ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paaranoja</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-353</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paaranoja]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 14:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[unless its on a german tank when swarms of fanboys will cry out in rain and scream &quot;russian bias&quot;

:D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>unless its on a german tank when swarms of fanboys will cry out in rain and scream &#8220;russian bias&#8221;</p>
<p>:D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavitz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-350</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:48:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yup, although as an owner of the 100 i don&#039;t really see anything really bad (1k+ battles, 50%+ WR) with this, i&#039;m more concerned with the 268 getting some more armor =)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, although as an owner of the 100 i don&#8217;t really see anything really bad (1k+ battles, 50%+ WR) with this, i&#8217;m more concerned with the 268 getting some more armor =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silentstalker</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-349</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silentstalker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:46:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DaMaZz: Check the original link, the E-100 change is there.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaMaZz: Check the original link, the E-100 change is there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaMaZz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[DaMaZz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wait, u actually wanna say that it gets less armored then before? i thought there&#039;s gonna be some kid of a buff for the spaced amor..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait, u actually wanna say that it gets less armored then before? i thought there&#8217;s gonna be some kid of a buff for the spaced amor..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavitz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-347</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:38:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically - yes, but it&#039;s so small that you can&#039;t count that as a nerf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically &#8211; yes, but it&#8217;s so small that you can&#8217;t count that as a nerf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavitz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/08/0-8-6-armor-changes-update/#comment-346</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Jun 2013 13:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=93#comment-346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The side armor of the hull gets a bit less (non-substantial) and the track covers (if you happen to find a model without the skirts - you&#039;ll get my meaning) get a LOT less (smth like 20 or 30mm down from ~100). That&#039;s besides the turret movement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The side armor of the hull gets a bit less (non-substantial) and the track covers (if you happen to find a model without the skirts &#8211; you&#8217;ll get my meaning) get a LOT less (smth like 20 or 30mm down from ~100). That&#8217;s besides the turret movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
