<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 11.6.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jun 2013 15:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-968</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why would you want any of your developers to be hated? How does it benefit the customers by having a developer who seems know much less about the game, than the players themselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why would you want any of your developers to be hated? How does it benefit the customers by having a developer who seems know much less about the game, than the players themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cicc</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cicc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-866</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s called e-sports, not cybersports.
Btw, keep up the great work, I love your blog. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called e-sports, not cybersports.<br />
Btw, keep up the great work, I love your blog. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-804</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 01:22:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-804</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There actual targeting pamphlets that were handed out that said in a graphical forum that X,Y and Z are the places you should try to hit first if you can.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There actual targeting pamphlets that were handed out that said in a graphical forum that X,Y and Z are the places you should try to hit first if you can.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-803</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jun 2013 01:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-803</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Self Propelled 17pdr, Valentine, Mk I, Archer

I suppose you could squeeze  on a 20pdr or 25pder on it as well...

Sure its slow... has no transverse... but why not?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self Propelled 17pdr, Valentine, Mk I, Archer</p>
<p>I suppose you could squeeze  on a 20pdr or 25pder on it as well&#8230;</p>
<p>Sure its slow&#8230; has no transverse&#8230; but why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jiri_Starrider</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jiri_Starrider]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not on the NA/EU/SEA one... And anyway the portal link up top on NA and EU is back (and never left on RU and SEA), aside from the link under the Game section.

hmmmm, ponders adding spherical tank article to Wiki....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not on the NA/EU/SEA one&#8230; And anyway the portal link up top on NA and EU is back (and never left on RU and SEA), aside from the link under the Game section.</p>
<p>hmmmm, ponders adding spherical tank article to Wiki&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Slakrrrrrr .</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-792</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Slakrrrrrr .]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-792</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Xbox WoT wasn’t made for Xbox One, because One doesn’t have a decent base of users yet&quot;

Yup, we all know why that is :)

&quot;Today I heard an interesting theory on RU forums (allegedly from come community contributor folks there) as to what it might be: British line, ending with Chieftain prototypes, also having allegedly some light tanks… with 20pdrs. Odd, but I really hope it’s true :)&quot;

So we&#039;re getting the Vickers Design No. 45569 T, followed by Chieftain-based designs? Doesn&#039;t really make sense in my opinion, as WG could have just made a second British heavy line starting at tier 5...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Xbox WoT wasn’t made for Xbox One, because One doesn’t have a decent base of users yet&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup, we all know why that is :)</p>
<p>&#8220;Today I heard an interesting theory on RU forums (allegedly from come community contributor folks there) as to what it might be: British line, ending with Chieftain prototypes, also having allegedly some light tanks… with 20pdrs. Odd, but I really hope it’s true :)&#8221;</p>
<p>So we&#8217;re getting the Vickers Design No. 45569 T, followed by Chieftain-based designs? Doesn&#8217;t really make sense in my opinion, as WG could have just made a second British heavy line starting at tier 5&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-790</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 23:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-790</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So, Kraut&#039;s second TD line(Waffentragers) most likely won&#039;t even come this year. And i can&#039;t even remember when they were first announced. Storm may be &quot;the good cop&quot; but SerB is definitely retarded annoying one.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Kraut&#8217;s second TD line(Waffentragers) most likely won&#8217;t even come this year. And i can&#8217;t even remember when they were first announced. Storm may be &#8220;the good cop&#8221; but SerB is definitely retarded annoying one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bravo_two_Six</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-789</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bravo_two_Six]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 22:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As much as i want the Chieftan, i think its about time the French made an appearance, they&#039;ve gone the longest now without new tech. But i am afraid they&#039;ve been shoved into the cupboard :S]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as i want the Chieftan, i think its about time the French made an appearance, they&#8217;ve gone the longest now without new tech. But i am afraid they&#8217;ve been shoved into the cupboard :S</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ulmj</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-785</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ulmj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 21:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-785</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[8.8 The Chieftain (Prototype)... Fingers crossed! 

There really is light at the end of the tunnel!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>8.8 The Chieftain (Prototype)&#8230; Fingers crossed! </p>
<p>There really is light at the end of the tunnel!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dhubba4141</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/11/11-6-2013/#comment-782</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dhubba4141]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Jun 2013 20:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=145#comment-782</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[El Halluf is shared. In WoWP, if you fly near the center, you can see the WoT El Halluf. Lighthouse in WoWP also appears to be very similar to Cliff in WoT. I figure they&#039;ll keep doing this more in the future, at least sometimes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>El Halluf is shared. In WoWP, if you fly near the center, you can see the WoT El Halluf. Lighthouse in WoWP also appears to be very similar to Cliff in WoT. I figure they&#8217;ll keep doing this more in the future, at least sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
