Comments on: The T110E4

By: lostwingman

lostwingman — Wed, 12 Jun 2013 15:06:09 +0000

Unfortunately until WG decides that they have any semblance of creativity we won’t see the T58 for balance reasons.

By: energycore

energycore — Wed, 12 Jun 2013 00:03:03 +0000

that isn’t the same as being able to traverse a tank gun within a system that can itself traverse

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 17:10:00 +0000

The M60 Patton has a fully rotatable commander’s cupola with a MG

By: Adam Meizner

Adam Meizner — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:32:00 +0000

The only flaw in his trolling logic is that it doesn’t matter if I join the army, I still won’t be able to drive around with a T110E4 (without a turret), shooting a Maus. Lol!

By: Otto-matic Reiffel

Otto-matic Reiffel — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 15:03:18 +0000

I can already tell you his response “Want realism? Join the army.”

By: Dickus Biggus

Dickus Biggus — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 13:20:03 +0000

E4 is… odd. Hull like E5, but turret… It’s both advantage and disadvantage. I would preffer T58. T57 with 155 mm gun, 3 rounds clip. And some resonable reloading time (instead of armor).

By: Adam Meizner

Adam Meizner — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:55:30 +0000

Can somebody please post a qustion on the Russian Q&A, wth this post linked/copied in? I’d love to see how/what SerB would troll on it :))

By: Prus Prusić

Prus Prusić — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 12:29:50 +0000

Anyone for teh T95 on tier 10 then?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:47:56 +0000

SerB, the Propaganda Minister of Wargaming

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 11 Jun 2013 11:25:26 +0000

Where idiots are still paying for this shit.