<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15.6.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavitz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh, so the chinese branch of fucked up t-54 and is-3 clones is perfectly fine?
Sure, go ahead, let&#039;s make another branch that&#039;s either a clone, a replica or a different countries tank...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, so the chinese branch of fucked up t-54 and is-3 clones is perfectly fine?<br />
Sure, go ahead, let&#8217;s make another branch that&#8217;s either a clone, a replica or a different countries tank&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavitz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AFAIK splash doesn&#039;t count towards pot.dmg if the shell didn&#039;t hit you. I&#039;m not sure about this - but my E-100 has had quite a few fights when GwTigers would splash the shit out of me from 5-7 shells, without any of them connecting, i&#039;d lose 1.5-2k health - and the stat would show my like 1k pot.dmg. 
Though of course there&#039;s no real point in that stat - apart from laughing when your Bat.Chat takes 3-5k dmg or 12-14k on the E-100.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AFAIK splash doesn&#8217;t count towards pot.dmg if the shell didn&#8217;t hit you. I&#8217;m not sure about this &#8211; but my E-100 has had quite a few fights when GwTigers would splash the shit out of me from 5-7 shells, without any of them connecting, i&#8217;d lose 1.5-2k health &#8211; and the stat would show my like 1k pot.dmg.<br />
Though of course there&#8217;s no real point in that stat &#8211; apart from laughing when your Bat.Chat takes 3-5k dmg or 12-14k on the E-100.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1238</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Israelis would be a branch with many very interesting tank designs (although they didn&#039;t &quot;produce&quot;, they made very extensive modifications/mixes from everything they grabbed) and unlike Argentinians, they USED their tanks in real combat. The problem, like with China, is with low tiers, everything starts at tier 4/5+ (less copying, though).
This is the branch i wait most for. Still, we need Japanese and Italian before.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israelis would be a branch with many very interesting tank designs (although they didn&#8217;t &#8220;produce&#8221;, they made very extensive modifications/mixes from everything they grabbed) and unlike Argentinians, they USED their tanks in real combat. The problem, like with China, is with low tiers, everything starts at tier 4/5+ (less copying, though).<br />
This is the branch i wait most for. Still, we need Japanese and Italian before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1236</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AwfulPanther has awful viewrange+stealthness combo so only radical viewrange buff can make it a good tank (like to 430m base). I would much prefer that to hp buff or gun buff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AwfulPanther has awful viewrange+stealthness combo so only radical viewrange buff can make it a good tank (like to 430m base). I would much prefer that to hp buff or gun buff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Sonny</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex Sonny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well yes, the armour nerf would happen mainly because of the historical inaccuracy, but if the developers want to keep the SP historical they will also have to buff it&#039;s penetration, it isn&#039;t called Super Pershing for no reason, in reality it carried both better armour and better gun than the actual Pershing. The gun SP really had was to be equal to that of the Tiger. So if they want to continue their &quot;historical accuracy&quot; bullshit, WG will also have to buff SP&#039;s gun quite a bit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yes, the armour nerf would happen mainly because of the historical inaccuracy, but if the developers want to keep the SP historical they will also have to buff it&#8217;s penetration, it isn&#8217;t called Super Pershing for no reason, in reality it carried both better armour and better gun than the actual Pershing. The gun SP really had was to be equal to that of the Tiger. So if they want to continue their &#8220;historical accuracy&#8221; bullshit, WG will also have to buff SP&#8217;s gun quite a bit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: orzel286_eu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1234</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[orzel286_eu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 11:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1234</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Want realism? Join the army.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want realism? Join the army.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nebsif (EU)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1227</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nebsif (EU)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 08:49:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[same. really interested in Israeli branch, any more info/linkies please? I can only dream about Tiran.. my favorite tank (T-54) with a 105mm!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>same. really interested in Israeli branch, any more info/linkies please? I can only dream about Tiran.. my favorite tank (T-54) with a 105mm!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1225</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 08:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh boy, can&#039;t wait for merchant tanks, if they do make an Israeli tree. Gonna be a day 1 free XP buy straight to tier X for me.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, can&#8217;t wait for merchant tanks, if they do make an Israeli tree. Gonna be a day 1 free XP buy straight to tier X for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:42:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great argument until you realize that Wargaming has never said this was a WW2-themed game, but at its most detailed the Wiki states that it&#039;s a game of mid-20th century armoured warfare. It&#039;s logic like that that comes from the kind of guy with an in-game name of 1ST_PANZERFORCE_WHITTMAN_ROMMEL_MONTGOMERY (sic) who hides his Tiger behind arty while telling us all in-game that you&#039;re there to protect arty.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great argument until you realize that Wargaming has never said this was a WW2-themed game, but at its most detailed the Wiki states that it&#8217;s a game of mid-20th century armoured warfare. It&#8217;s logic like that that comes from the kind of guy with an in-game name of 1ST_PANZERFORCE_WHITTMAN_ROMMEL_MONTGOMERY (sic) who hides his Tiger behind arty while telling us all in-game that you&#8217;re there to protect arty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anh Tú Đỗ</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/15/15-6-2013/#comment-1219</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anh Tú Đỗ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Jun 2013 23:21:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=167#comment-1219</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[why ?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
