<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 16.6.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lavitz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1430</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavitz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 18:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1430</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And what would be the point of making yet another patton? 
The KRV (from what i found - the KRV is the 103 S) at least seems different - and completely unplayable with 0deg elevation and traverse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And what would be the point of making yet another patton?<br />
The KRV (from what i found &#8211; the KRV is the 103 S) at least seems different &#8211; and completely unplayable with 0deg elevation and traverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PalmNut</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1380</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PalmNut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can&#039;t face the truth of myrgument so you use ad personam argument ? So sad ;__;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t face the truth of myrgument so you use ad personam argument ? So sad ;__;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1377</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This replay is adressed to PalmNut on June 16, 2013 at 8:59 pm said:]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This replay is adressed to PalmNut on June 16, 2013 at 8:59 pm said:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1376</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mucho stupido hombre? Well i am playing russkies(KV-1 recently bought) just bcs it&#039;s easy mode tank which is perfect for anti-stress...first T5 battle i fought in it i get 10 kills and my first pools medal....also i don&#039;t play that much T10&#039;s bcs they are not fun, and last T10 i drove was IS-7...just bcs it&#039;s so much easier to play than others....so there you go...i materialize my conspriacy more than enough...soon i&#039;m gonna buy KV-1s to prove how blatantly OP that tank is...i already have it researched from KV-1 just didn&#039;t bought it yet...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mucho stupido hombre? Well i am playing russkies(KV-1 recently bought) just bcs it&#8217;s easy mode tank which is perfect for anti-stress&#8230;first T5 battle i fought in it i get 10 kills and my first pools medal&#8230;.also i don&#8217;t play that much T10&#8242;s bcs they are not fun, and last T10 i drove was IS-7&#8230;just bcs it&#8217;s so much easier to play than others&#8230;.so there you go&#8230;i materialize my conspriacy more than enough&#8230;soon i&#8217;m gonna buy KV-1s to prove how blatantly OP that tank is&#8230;i already have it researched from KV-1 just didn&#8217;t bought it yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PalmNut</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1375</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PalmNut]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 14:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1375</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Guys remember that when IS-4 was first introduced as tier IX it had nerfed turret armor to the ground. IS-4 in its original stats is too powerful on tier IX and to weak on tier X due to weak gun. With IS-8 gun its a decent tier X but then again... iS-4 currently as it is looks like a saber tooth rabbit]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guys remember that when IS-4 was first introduced as tier IX it had nerfed turret armor to the ground. IS-4 in its original stats is too powerful on tier IX and to weak on tier X due to weak gun. With IS-8 gun its a decent tier X but then again&#8230; iS-4 currently as it is looks like a saber tooth rabbit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob the dubious</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1362</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bob the dubious]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 13:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1362</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Italians can field a decent range of heavy tanks as well actually although their best candidate for Tier 10 would be an M60 which is still okay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Italians can field a decent range of heavy tanks as well actually although their best candidate for Tier 10 would be an M60 which is still okay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nyan cat</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1357</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nyan cat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 12:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read it, it&#039;s not long - 2 pages only.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read it, it&#8217;s not long &#8211; 2 pages only.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hokum</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hokum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1330</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WG EU forums down again. Another hack??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WG EU forums down again. Another hack??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vivere est cogitare</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1327</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vivere est cogitare]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1327</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That forum thread is closed, btw. What was written there?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That forum thread is closed, btw. What was written there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Srap</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/16/16-6-2013/#comment-1323</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Srap]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 08:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=178#comment-1323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So all servers are being patched to 8.6 this week?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So all servers are being patched to 8.6 this week?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
