Comments on: Ensign’s Q&A #7 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: bingo players rattle http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-3873 Thu, 27 Jun 2013 04:26:04 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-3873 excellent points altogether, you simply gained a new reader.
What may you suggest in regards to your publish that you simply made some days ago?
Any sure?

Feel free to surf to my weblog: bingo players rattle

]]> By: Ensign’s Q&A #8 | For The Record http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-3490 Wed, 26 Jun 2013 00:44:14 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-3490 [...] Welcome to another edition of my Q&A! The previous one can be found here. [...]

]]> By: EnsignExpendable http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-1866 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:29:40 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-1866 Aw, that’s cute, I have a fan club.

]]> By: EnsignExpendable http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-1864 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:29:22 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-1864 The Tiger II needed a brand new turret and a new crew member to mount the 105 mm guns, and in the game, it needs neither. Ahnenerbe working as intended.

]]> By: EnsignExpendable http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-1863 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 16:28:33 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-1863 You can enlarge a turret ring if you need to, as long as the hull allows it. Besides, the KV hull could fit a KV-2 turret with no modifications to the turret ring. The IS turret is not that massive.

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-1830 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 15:15:41 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-1830 The KV-85 is a KV-1s with a IS turret.

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-1823 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:46:52 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-1823 Just kick this tool off your site. All he does is linking to his moronic little blog about tanks. He already made himself a laughing stock on the US forums.

]]> By: Wolcott http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-1822 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:34:52 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-1822 Tiger with the long 88 was little more than a paper project, but that was all the proof SerB needed. Otherwise it would have been a tier 6 tank instead. Tiger on viagra I call it.

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-1818 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:15:47 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-1818 So remind me again, how many Tigers were running around with 88mm L/71 IRL?

]]> By: Wolcott http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/18/ensigns-qa-7/#comment-1814 Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:56:17 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=107#comment-1814 SerB only needed a experimental prototype to justify hundreds of players playing the KV-1S with the 122 mm. Great.

]]>