<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 0.8.6 MM weight table</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Piotr Kordy</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-3222</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Piotr Kordy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 09:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-3222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm, looking at vehicle.xml from res/scripts/item_defs/vehicles/common I got these values:
for light/medium/AT-SPG 2.0 3.0 5.0 8.0 12.0 18.0 27.0 40.0 60.0 100.0
for heavy/SPG           2.4 3.6 6.0 9.6 14.4 21.6 32.0 48.0 72.0 120.0
Exceptions:
ussr:T-54 72.0
usa:M46_Patton 72.0
germany:E-50 72.0
ussr:Object_704 72.0
germany:JagdTiger 72.0
usa:T95 72.0
germany:H39_captured 7.0
ussr:ISU-152 48.0
germany:Ferdinand 48.0
usa:T28 48.0
ussr:T_50_2 21.6
germany:VK2801 21.6
usa:M24_Chaffee 21.6
usa:T28_Prototype 48.0
usa:T30 72.0
germany:JagdTiger_SdKfz_185 48.0
france:AMX_AC_Mle1948 48.0
france:AMX50_Foch 72.0
germany:JagdPantherII 48.0
germany:JagdPz_E100 120.0
germany:E50_Ausf_M 120.0
usa:T110E4 120.0
usa:T110E3 120.0
usa:M48A1 120.0
ussr:Object268 120.0
ussr:T62A 120.0
france:AMX_50Fosh_155 120.0
france:Bat_Chatillon25t 120.0
france:Lorraine40t 72.0
ussr:SU-101 48.0
ussr:SU122_54 72.0
ussr:Object263 120.0
uk:GB24_Centurion_Mk3 72.0
uk:GB70_FV4202_105 120.0
usa:T54E1 72.0
usa:T69 48.0
usa:Pershing 48.0
china:Ch01_Type59 48.0
china:Ch01_Type59_Gold 48.0
uk:GB22_Comet 32.4
uk:GB71_AT_15A 32.4
usa:Sherman_Jumbo 21.6
china:Ch17_WZ131_1_WZ132 48.0
china:Ch05_T34_2 48.0
china:Ch18_WZ-120 72.0
china:Ch19_121 120.0
uk:GB72_AT15 48.0
uk:GB32_Tortoise 72.0
uk:GB48_FV215b_183 120.0
france:ELC_AMX 14.4
germany:VK1602 14.4
france:AMX_12t 21.6
usa:T21 21.6
china:Ch15_59_16 21.6
france:AMX_13_75 32.4
usa:T71 32.4
china:Ch16_WZ_131 32.4
china:Ch02_Type62 32.4
france:AMX_13_90 48.0
germany:Auf_Panther 32.4
germany:VK3002DB 32.4
germany:Indien_Panzer 48.0
germany:Pro_Ag_A 72.0
germany:Leopard1 120.0
ussr:Object_907 120.0
usa:M60 120.0
germany:E-25 32.4

Is anybody able to determine if the table in the post or the data in the file are correct?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, looking at vehicle.xml from res/scripts/item_defs/vehicles/common I got these values:<br />
for light/medium/AT-SPG 2.0 3.0 5.0 8.0 12.0 18.0 27.0 40.0 60.0 100.0<br />
for heavy/SPG           2.4 3.6 6.0 9.6 14.4 21.6 32.0 48.0 72.0 120.0<br />
Exceptions:<br />
ussr:T-54 72.0<br />
usa:M46_Patton 72.0<br />
germany:E-50 72.0<br />
ussr:Object_704 72.0<br />
germany:JagdTiger 72.0<br />
usa:T95 72.0<br />
germany:H39_captured 7.0<br />
ussr:ISU-152 48.0<br />
germany:Ferdinand 48.0<br />
usa:T28 48.0<br />
ussr:T_50_2 21.6<br />
germany:VK2801 21.6<br />
usa:M24_Chaffee 21.6<br />
usa:T28_Prototype 48.0<br />
usa:T30 72.0<br />
germany:JagdTiger_SdKfz_185 48.0<br />
france:AMX_AC_Mle1948 48.0<br />
france:AMX50_Foch 72.0<br />
germany:JagdPantherII 48.0<br />
germany:JagdPz_E100 120.0<br />
germany:E50_Ausf_M 120.0<br />
usa:T110E4 120.0<br />
usa:T110E3 120.0<br />
usa:M48A1 120.0<br />
ussr:Object268 120.0<br />
ussr:T62A 120.0<br />
france:AMX_50Fosh_155 120.0<br />
france:Bat_Chatillon25t 120.0<br />
france:Lorraine40t 72.0<br />
ussr:SU-101 48.0<br />
ussr:SU122_54 72.0<br />
ussr:Object263 120.0<br />
uk:GB24_Centurion_Mk3 72.0<br />
uk:GB70_FV4202_105 120.0<br />
usa:T54E1 72.0<br />
usa:T69 48.0<br />
usa:Pershing 48.0<br />
china:Ch01_Type59 48.0<br />
china:Ch01_Type59_Gold 48.0<br />
uk:GB22_Comet 32.4<br />
uk:GB71_AT_15A 32.4<br />
usa:Sherman_Jumbo 21.6<br />
china:Ch17_WZ131_1_WZ132 48.0<br />
china:Ch05_T34_2 48.0<br />
china:Ch18_WZ-120 72.0<br />
china:Ch19_121 120.0<br />
uk:GB72_AT15 48.0<br />
uk:GB32_Tortoise 72.0<br />
uk:GB48_FV215b_183 120.0<br />
france:ELC_AMX 14.4<br />
germany:VK1602 14.4<br />
france:AMX_12t 21.6<br />
usa:T21 21.6<br />
china:Ch15_59_16 21.6<br />
france:AMX_13_75 32.4<br />
usa:T71 32.4<br />
china:Ch16_WZ_131 32.4<br />
china:Ch02_Type62 32.4<br />
france:AMX_13_90 48.0<br />
germany:Auf_Panther 32.4<br />
germany:VK3002DB 32.4<br />
germany:Indien_Panzer 48.0<br />
germany:Pro_Ag_A 72.0<br />
germany:Leopard1 120.0<br />
ussr:Object_907 120.0<br />
usa:M60 120.0<br />
germany:E-25 32.4</p>
<p>Is anybody able to determine if the table in the post or the data in the file are correct?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medjed</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2120</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Medjed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 18:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2120</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Imo gold ammo is not that big of a problem in T2 battles since only seal clubbers tend to use it. What killed H38 are new high pen/dmg tanks like brits, Tetrarch have monster gun and even MS-1 have gun that pens with ease H38....right now that tank is nothing special at all...everything pens it and it slow as shit thus making it very hard to play.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Imo gold ammo is not that big of a problem in T2 battles since only seal clubbers tend to use it. What killed H38 are new high pen/dmg tanks like brits, Tetrarch have monster gun and even MS-1 have gun that pens with ease H38&#8230;.right now that tank is nothing special at all&#8230;everything pens it and it slow as shit thus making it very hard to play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Misfire42</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2112</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Misfire42]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is this official? I&#039;m asking because the wiki doesn&#039;t have very good information about MM weight (read: barely any), and if it is official I&#039;d love to add it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this official? I&#8217;m asking because the wiki doesn&#8217;t have very good information about MM weight (read: barely any), and if it is official I&#8217;d love to add it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: energycore</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[energycore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i&#039;m pretty sure what killed the 38H was gold ammo for credits.

I&#039;m not complaining though, the thing still carries hard, just not as hard and you have to be more conservative]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m pretty sure what killed the 38H was gold ammo for credits.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not complaining though, the thing still carries hard, just not as hard and you have to be more conservative</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: energycore</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[energycore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:28:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[companies are a complete different realm where teams are running close to optimal setups. And gameplay wise, i&#039;d say the IS-3 is 44% better than a T20 definitely]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>companies are a complete different realm where teams are running close to optimal setups. And gameplay wise, i&#8217;d say the IS-3 is 44% better than a T20 definitely</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: energycore</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2099</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[energycore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 17:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2099</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the marder nerfs made it unplayable for me. and that&#039;s after 1.1k games on it]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the marder nerfs made it unplayable for me. and that&#8217;s after 1.1k games on it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ammarmar</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2087</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ammarmar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 16:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marder was nerfed, so it&#039;s not as easy as it was to kill KV-1 tanks with it. Which was GOOD, seeing as KV-1 is a heavy tanks 2 tiers higher than Marder.

But in its tier, Marder is still a killing machine. Hell, any tier II TD will dispatch micromaus with ease, and they have less than HALF weight according to the chart...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marder was nerfed, so it&#8217;s not as easy as it was to kill KV-1 tanks with it. Which was GOOD, seeing as KV-1 is a heavy tanks 2 tiers higher than Marder.</p>
<p>But in its tier, Marder is still a killing machine. Hell, any tier II TD will dispatch micromaus with ease, and they have less than HALF weight according to the chart&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stavro375</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stavro375]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 15:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t the marder nerfed into oblivion a while ago?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t the marder nerfed into oblivion a while ago?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stavro375</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2072</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[stavro375]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Clearly someone at WG was drunk when they assigned the tier 4 weights.

Not that I&#039;m complaining that my Matilda gets *slightly* better mm than B1 (at expense of seeing tier 6 tanks)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clearly someone at WG was drunk when they assigned the tier 4 weights.</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m complaining that my Matilda gets *slightly* better mm than B1 (at expense of seeing tier 6 tanks)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkmancer</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/20/0-8-6-mm-weight-table/#comment-2065</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkmancer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 14:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=250#comment-2065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While it&#039;s opp for its tier 7 points does seem OTT especially as tier 3 stuff is set at 5 points.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While it&#8217;s opp for its tier 7 points does seem OTT especially as tier 3 stuff is set at 5 points.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
