<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 24.6.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ewan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-23340</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ewan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-23340</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this is something i have not ever read.very comprehensive analysis.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is something i have not ever read.very comprehensive analysis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThaElf</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3966</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ThaElf]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually quite good observation.

Instead of saying something is OP, lets start having discussion of too many *insert tank* ... But this is near impossiblity for some tanks and because SPGs can be lumped by dimwits in minsk as one tank, this can be done only to SPGs.

Still the nerf to SPGs killed artillery AND tanks doing spotting for them. I would not touch the SPGs apart from CW anymore, not even for 5x, when I was actually doing that for before the nerfs and tier &#039;balanchit&#039;. I had to grind artilleries to actually worsen the situation to get to the T8 before the patch and now... without any reason to play them due to knowing them utter bullshit from what they used to be. Actually having a reasonable impact, less than tanks thout so the SPGs actually were underpowered in comparison bar some of them. But WG only noted the ones which were overpowered and balanced ALL artillery according to that info.

Sad day was the day 8.6 went live and whole arty nerf was rolled on without second thout. Comments like:&#039;We nerf them because we want to lessen the amount of playing them&#039; make me quite sad... how about IS-7 and IS-4 nerf then? They are inarguably the most played tanks on high tier... or KV or KV-1s for that matter. Or many other which are significantly played more than others... Tanks should not be balanced because they have many players, but from the numbers of winning... But WG fails to see that. Sadly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually quite good observation.</p>
<p>Instead of saying something is OP, lets start having discussion of too many *insert tank* &#8230; But this is near impossiblity for some tanks and because SPGs can be lumped by dimwits in minsk as one tank, this can be done only to SPGs.</p>
<p>Still the nerf to SPGs killed artillery AND tanks doing spotting for them. I would not touch the SPGs apart from CW anymore, not even for 5x, when I was actually doing that for before the nerfs and tier &#8216;balanchit&#8217;. I had to grind artilleries to actually worsen the situation to get to the T8 before the patch and now&#8230; without any reason to play them due to knowing them utter bullshit from what they used to be. Actually having a reasonable impact, less than tanks thout so the SPGs actually were underpowered in comparison bar some of them. But WG only noted the ones which were overpowered and balanced ALL artillery according to that info.</p>
<p>Sad day was the day 8.6 went live and whole arty nerf was rolled on without second thout. Comments like:&#8217;We nerf them because we want to lessen the amount of playing them&#8217; make me quite sad&#8230; how about IS-7 and IS-4 nerf then? They are inarguably the most played tanks on high tier&#8230; or KV or KV-1s for that matter. Or many other which are significantly played more than others&#8230; Tanks should not be balanced because they have many players, but from the numbers of winning&#8230; But WG fails to see that. Sadly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 【Developer Q&#38;A 】2013/6/23, 6/24– R2D2 &#124; XVM战绩插件中文化团队</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3216</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[【Developer Q&#38;A 】2013/6/23, 6/24– R2D2 &#124; XVM战绩插件中文化团队]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 08:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...]  原文:[http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/] 翻译:http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6337266  - SerB confirmed the work is finishing on ingame [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...]  原文:[http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/] 翻译:<a href="http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6337266" rel="nofollow">http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6337266</a>  &#8211; SerB confirmed the work is finishing on ingame [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vincent vilcko</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3209</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[vincent vilcko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 07:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3209</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- SerB considers top tiers to be “high-skill content”, because only good players can play them without losing credits

- thank you :-)
i earned with e-100 around 200k yesterday, cca 30k per battle :-)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- SerB considers top tiers to be “high-skill content”, because only good players can play them without losing credits</p>
<p>- thank you :-)<br />
i earned with e-100 around 200k yesterday, cca 30k per battle :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazsom</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3191</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mazsom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 06:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[+1 :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mazsom</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mazsom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 06:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It could be they only had to pop out for a piss and will be back in a couple dozen seconds. And be much better than the &quot;controlling&quot; fast dying noobs.

I really hope that this will NEVER happen!

In any kind of online real-time game there are a few afkers, but you can live with it I think. There really isn&#039;t much in WoT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be they only had to pop out for a piss and will be back in a couple dozen seconds. And be much better than the &#8220;controlling&#8221; fast dying noobs.</p>
<p>I really hope that this will NEVER happen!</p>
<p>In any kind of online real-time game there are a few afkers, but you can live with it I think. There really isn&#8217;t much in WoT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gino Ginelli</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3189</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gino Ginelli]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 06:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3189</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[my last sentence was rather polemic than serious but as you seem to take it serious:
you can still be ingenious despite the education system.
you know causality =&gt; correlation, not the other way around.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>my last sentence was rather polemic than serious but as you seem to take it serious:<br />
you can still be ingenious despite the education system.<br />
you know causality =&gt; correlation, not the other way around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wolcott</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3187</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wolcott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jun 2013 05:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;Walker Bulldog will come “when it’s done”

Walker Bulldog will not come because paper tanks come first.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;Walker Bulldog will come “when it’s done”</p>
<p>Walker Bulldog will not come because paper tanks come first.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Awruk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Awruk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[P. Cherenkov, B. Pasternak, M. Sholokhov, P. Kapitsa, N. Basov, L. Landau, S. Novikov, A. Sakharov, G. Perelman, S. Korolev, D. Shostakovich...

Soviet education.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>P. Cherenkov, B. Pasternak, M. Sholokhov, P. Kapitsa, N. Basov, L. Landau, S. Novikov, A. Sakharov, G. Perelman, S. Korolev, D. Shostakovich&#8230;</p>
<p>Soviet education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/24/24-6-2013/#comment-3110</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jun 2013 22:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=346#comment-3110</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude... I play SPGs. I have 6 in my garage and had 7 but I was grinding through the new German T2. Once I get the credits I will buy the new German T4 and then the T3 Wespe. 

On my Grille I can get 2 kills a match if I try for kills. But due to reload and aim its easier to try for max damage as often as possible. 900 damage and 1100 damage for 2 games last night. Although it could be only 250 damage if you are having some really bad luck with gun troll. Or have no flank protection... panzies and no flank protection... 

Really, artillery can be very very very good. Still.  in 8.6. HOWEVER, a 2-5sec spot on a target by your team does not work anymore. To be effective artillery needs that tank spotted for 6-10s to be effective because if artillery cant see the target then it cant always help out.  Spotting is more important NOW then ever before. In fact I would say that it is more important then artillery. 

NEMO.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude&#8230; I play SPGs. I have 6 in my garage and had 7 but I was grinding through the new German T2. Once I get the credits I will buy the new German T4 and then the T3 Wespe. </p>
<p>On my Grille I can get 2 kills a match if I try for kills. But due to reload and aim its easier to try for max damage as often as possible. 900 damage and 1100 damage for 2 games last night. Although it could be only 250 damage if you are having some really bad luck with gun troll. Or have no flank protection&#8230; panzies and no flank protection&#8230; </p>
<p>Really, artillery can be very very very good. Still.  in 8.6. HOWEVER, a 2-5sec spot on a target by your team does not work anymore. To be effective artillery needs that tank spotted for 6-10s to be effective because if artillery cant see the target then it cant always help out.  Spotting is more important NOW then ever before. In fact I would say that it is more important then artillery. </p>
<p>NEMO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
