<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ensign&#8217;s Q&amp;A #8</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sergio martinez chavez jr</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-28000</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sergio martinez chavez jr]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 02:50:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-28000</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, just wanted to mention, I enjoyed this article.
It was funny. Keep on posting!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, just wanted to mention, I enjoyed this article.<br />
It was funny. Keep on posting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-14857</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-14857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Object 279 eh ridiculous tracks and insane armor angles, I wonder what happen if you put in-game and the player&#039;s response would be OMFG? Is that UFO on tracks :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Object 279 eh ridiculous tracks and insane armor angles, I wonder what happen if you put in-game and the player&#8217;s response would be OMFG? Is that UFO on tracks :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ensign&#8217;s Q&#38;A #9 &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-12688</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ensign&#8217;s Q&#38;A #9 &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:31:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-12688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Previous Q&amp;A [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Previous Q&amp;A [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnsignExpendable</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-3593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnsignExpendable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-3593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It was in a Q&amp;A thread a long time ago, last summer IIRC. When asked what thing he would undo given the chance, he said putting the IS-7 in the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was in a Q&amp;A thread a long time ago, last summer IIRC. When asked what thing he would undo given the chance, he said putting the IS-7 in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnsignExpendable</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-3592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnsignExpendable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 12:19:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-3592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not fully submerged, but they did test fording water hazards without any equipment.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not fully submerged, but they did test fording water hazards without any equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Warxofx23th</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-3552</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Warxofx23th]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-3552</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Did the Russians tested some Polish (captured) tank projects and did they use one or two of them on the battlefield?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did the Russians tested some Polish (captured) tank projects and did they use one or two of them on the battlefield?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-3538</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-3538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Was arty nerf overdone? Maybe, but I won&#039;t cry about it. It&#039;s still better than bunch of idiots with 400-500 eff sitting in GW Tiger with one hand on the mouse, the other hand no doubt scratching balls and lobbying shells for +1000dmg.  There no perfect solution for it, but this is better than +5 arty retards per side.  Pre 8.6 playing arty was way too easy, even an arty noob like myself was able to get +2000 avg dmg per game in SU-14. It had a certain appeal for very weak players, hence that rising popularity of arty.  Also my impression is that right now in 8.6 we mostly seeing good arty players.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was arty nerf overdone? Maybe, but I won&#8217;t cry about it. It&#8217;s still better than bunch of idiots with 400-500 eff sitting in GW Tiger with one hand on the mouse, the other hand no doubt scratching balls and lobbying shells for +1000dmg.  There no perfect solution for it, but this is better than +5 arty retards per side.  Pre 8.6 playing arty was way too easy, even an arty noob like myself was able to get +2000 avg dmg per game in SU-14. It had a certain appeal for very weak players, hence that rising popularity of arty.  Also my impression is that right now in 8.6 we mostly seeing good arty players.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoooSeR</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-3536</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoooSeR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-3536</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Only fueltanks in tracks mountings are external. IIRC Object 279 still have fueltanks inside of tank hull. IS-7, for example, have 2 external fueltanks along side armor inside of &quot;falseboard&quot; (side spaced armor), but it also have 2 fueltanks in hull (between torsion bars AFAIK).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only fueltanks in tracks mountings are external. IIRC Object 279 still have fueltanks inside of tank hull. IS-7, for example, have 2 external fueltanks along side armor inside of &#8220;falseboard&#8221; (side spaced armor), but it also have 2 fueltanks in hull (between torsion bars AFAIK).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyttorak</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-3535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyttorak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-3535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[IS7 SerB&#039;s bigger mistake? I missed that declaration]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS7 SerB&#8217;s bigger mistake? I missed that declaration</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoooSeR</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/26/ensigns-qa-8/#comment-3534</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoooSeR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jun 2013 08:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=266#comment-3534</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe, they could limit numbers of track hits from one lucky side shots. Looking at all heavy tanks project from last Army heavy tank competition, Object 279 isn&#039;t best candidate for tier 10 HT. Object 277/278 and Object 770 are much better vehicles for WoT.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe, they could limit numbers of track hits from one lucky side shots. Looking at all heavy tanks project from last Army heavy tank competition, Object 279 isn&#8217;t best candidate for tier 10 HT. Object 277/278 and Object 770 are much better vehicles for WoT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
