Comments on: Supertest leaked vehicles

By: ninja 1000

ninja 1000 — Wed, 03 Jul 2013 11:34:10 +0000

Great web site. Lots of helpful info here. I am sending it to several pals ans also sharing in delicious. And naturally, thank you on your sweat! ninja 1000 http://www.cellsea.com/user/home/CR51bed52c22553

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:50:16 +0000

It’s armour is probbaly gonna be low

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 27 Jun 2013 09:04:38 +0000

I’m sorry, T-44-122? I dont think so.
The only thing T-44 and that thing have in common is the tracks.
A shorter, lower front end with an ugly Weakspot at the drivers side,
a high engine deck and a massive turret.
I think what we see here is the new tier 8 medium tank following after the A-44 or KV-13.

By: L0rd_0f_War

L0rd_0f_War — Thu, 27 Jun 2013 08:58:02 +0000

The German Tier 4 Heavy looks under-whelming due to its crappy gun selection (5cm is crap). Perhaps something in line with the 57mm gun on the T28 Russian med would make this tank competitive, even in Tier 5-6 battles, which it will face. the 5cm is useless in Tier 5-6 battles.

By: dr_Hannibalus

dr_Hannibalus — Thu, 27 Jun 2013 07:02:31 +0000

For a moment i saw 75mm konish on that Durschfallwagen… Thank God its not.

By: Tupinambis

Tupinambis — Thu, 27 Jun 2013 06:54:40 +0000

Its a tier 4 heavy tank.
Have you compared it to the B1?

By: lol'ed

lol'ed — Thu, 27 Jun 2013 05:26:48 +0000

if it will be tier4 it will be similar to matilda as it have around 80~ armor on everything and 20 max speed like matilda. As for gun it would have stock KwK37 L/24 and upgraded something like 7,5 cm KwK 40 L/48.

By: Priory_of_Sion

Priory_of_Sion — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 22:59:52 +0000

They were actually developed side by side but the VK 36.01(H)’s development lasted longer into 1942. It actually makes very good sense to me.

By: Nguyen Nhat Tai

Nguyen Nhat Tai — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 21:29:44 +0000

lol, another batch of copy paste tanks, I need something new……….

By: Alex

Alex — Wed, 26 Jun 2013 20:51:52 +0000

Vk 65.01 h before VK 36.01 h…Wouldn’t that be a bit not logical, development wise?…