<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Novus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-4345</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Novus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 18:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-4345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What? tier X tanks other then heavies are fine in my opinion. Historically thats how tank production went (MBT&#039;s), was also annoying for TD and Medium players not to get anything from clanwars because there tanks werent exactly used unless the strat was rather...needed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? tier X tanks other then heavies are fine in my opinion. Historically thats how tank production went (MBT&#8217;s), was also annoying for TD and Medium players not to get anything from clanwars because there tanks werent exactly used unless the strat was rather&#8230;needed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-4197</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Jun 2013 08:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-4197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[umm....It is very interesting blueprint !!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm&#8230;.It is very interesting blueprint !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daigensui</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-4019</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daigensui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:29:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-4019</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Where did you get that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where did you get that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mRBean93</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-4008</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mRBean93]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-4008</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey,

the L71 88mm APCR pen is 237.. make a Ausf X at the end..??

whats the prob? your design is semi historic anyway..??

sry for my terrible english :/

mRBean93]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey,</p>
<p>the L71 88mm APCR pen is 237.. make a Ausf X at the end..??</p>
<p>whats the prob? your design is semi historic anyway..??</p>
<p>sry for my terrible english :/</p>
<p>mRBean93</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-4001</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:20:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-4001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I did a tank gun more similar to the original L/68 in specs, using its APCR as standard ammo and E-50 L/52 heat ammo as premium.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I did a tank gun more similar to the original L/68 in specs, using its APCR as standard ammo and E-50 L/52 heat ammo as premium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-3999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All is left is a bunch of Maus prototypes...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All is left is a bunch of Maus prototypes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-3995</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-3995</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We need more japanese tanks informations, and researchers.

This is Type 4 Chi-to planned production model MHI blueprint
http://i.imgur.com/Ldtkrqn.jpg]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We need more japanese tanks informations, and researchers.</p>
<p>This is Type 4 Chi-to planned production model MHI blueprint<br />
<a href="http://i.imgur.com/Ldtkrqn.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://i.imgur.com/Ldtkrqn.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stieger11</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-3980</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stieger11]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-3980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like the basic idea, to give some interesting reward tanks for random players too. 
But I just don&#039;t really like this &#039;Wesersomething&#039;... It&#039;s just a new KT-clone... ok germans designed their tanks in such way... but do we need another twin for KT- E50 - E50M - E75? 
Something more unique tank would be nice... I know... it&#039;s a big problem to find something atleast semi historical stuff for germans in high tier, but still... :/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the basic idea, to give some interesting reward tanks for random players too.<br />
But I just don&#8217;t really like this &#8216;Wesersomething&#8217;&#8230; It&#8217;s just a new KT-clone&#8230; ok germans designed their tanks in such way&#8230; but do we need another twin for KT- E50 &#8211; E50M &#8211; E75?<br />
Something more unique tank would be nice&#8230; I know&#8230; it&#8217;s a big problem to find something atleast semi historical stuff for germans in high tier, but still&#8230; :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-3978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-3978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Almost full agree to your well written opinion:)

We have too many tanks with too small and view maps. Especially since some of these are only for lowtiers and others not anymore ingame:
Swamp
Dragon Ridge 
Province
Widepark
Serene Coast

There is certainly a point why they aren&#039;t for all tanks in the mapcycle, but also shows how many of the relatively small amount of maps aren&#039;t playable.

We need more Maps not more tanks!

I fear, that the new winter map will also be only for max midtier bu we will see.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Almost full agree to your well written opinion:)</p>
<p>We have too many tanks with too small and view maps. Especially since some of these are only for lowtiers and others not anymore ingame:<br />
Swamp<br />
Dragon Ridge<br />
Province<br />
Widepark<br />
Serene Coast</p>
<p>There is certainly a point why they aren&#8217;t for all tanks in the mapcycle, but also shows how many of the relatively small amount of maps aren&#8217;t playable.</p>
<p>We need more Maps not more tanks!</p>
<p>I fear, that the new winter map will also be only for max midtier bu we will see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skaianDestiny</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/27/new-poll/#comment-3976</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[skaianDestiny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2013 15:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=423#comment-3976</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;too many tanks

Um, I get your point about power creep, but this is WORLD of Tanks.  Of course they&#039;re gonna add more f*cking tanks.  Most of your points are the useless whining bullshit that SerB loves to make fun of.  Say what want about the man, he says what most developers are thinking without the PR department sugarcoating it.  Which can DEFINITELY be a bad thing.

I do agree that they need to do some more balancing like the 8.6 patch.  Things like the tier 5 HEAT rounds were certainly OP.  The increase in armor effectiveness and the general accuracy buff were good things.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;too many tanks</p>
<p>Um, I get your point about power creep, but this is WORLD of Tanks.  Of course they&#8217;re gonna add more f*cking tanks.  Most of your points are the useless whining bullshit that SerB loves to make fun of.  Say what want about the man, he says what most developers are thinking without the PR department sugarcoating it.  Which can DEFINITELY be a bad thing.</p>
<p>I do agree that they need to do some more balancing like the 8.6 patch.  Things like the tier 5 HEAT rounds were certainly OP.  The increase in armor effectiveness and the general accuracy buff were good things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
