<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MT-25 / T-50-2 comparison</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SinSorrow</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-6487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SinSorrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2013 00:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-6487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-50-2                                      MT-25                                Verdict:
Acceleration                                    Great  (10)                               Good   (7)                       HUGE Nerf -
Gun Elavation                                Not that good  (5)             Even more horrible (4)       Not a huge deal
Cornering                                        Great (10)                             Good (8)                           HUGE Nerf -
&quot;carousel capability&quot;                      Best in game (10)              Good (7)                            HUGE Nerf -
Crew                                                4 (commaner/radio)           5 (has radio-o)                 Buff for skills +
Size                                                   Great (9)                              Excelent (9)                       Not a big deal 

All in all, this is a VERY DIFFERENT TANK to play. I have now played 10games in test realm and few things that I was NOT able to do so well anymore: 
-Carousel! This tank loses speed when turning quite a lot. Even thought it says that hull traverse has been buffed up, this really cannot make so sharp turns. It seems WG dosent want light tanks to be able to cirle heavy /TD tanks anymore. 
-Slope- / hill climbing:  power to weight is toned down, when going uphill, this will lose speed fast! Dont even think of flanking any tank uphill anymore! 
-Agressive play: as thease things that made T-50-2 the tank we know and love, this will be like... A Stuart of somesort. 
-My advice: Grind the Chaffee untill it will be nerfed too. 

AND T-50 (tier4) is too really heavily nerfed!! you cannot skid with it anymore. Acceleration is way more slow than before not to mention the top speed! 

So WG decided to Nerf badly two of my most played (and loved) tanks in 8.7]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-50-2                                      MT-25                                Verdict:<br />
Acceleration                                    Great  (10)                               Good   (7)                       HUGE Nerf -<br />
Gun Elavation                                Not that good  (5)             Even more horrible (4)       Not a huge deal<br />
Cornering                                        Great (10)                             Good (8)                           HUGE Nerf -<br />
&#8220;carousel capability&#8221;                      Best in game (10)              Good (7)                            HUGE Nerf -<br />
Crew                                                4 (commaner/radio)           5 (has radio-o)                 Buff for skills +<br />
Size                                                   Great (9)                              Excelent (9)                       Not a big deal </p>
<p>All in all, this is a VERY DIFFERENT TANK to play. I have now played 10games in test realm and few things that I was NOT able to do so well anymore:<br />
-Carousel! This tank loses speed when turning quite a lot. Even thought it says that hull traverse has been buffed up, this really cannot make so sharp turns. It seems WG dosent want light tanks to be able to cirle heavy /TD tanks anymore.<br />
-Slope- / hill climbing:  power to weight is toned down, when going uphill, this will lose speed fast! Dont even think of flanking any tank uphill anymore!<br />
-Agressive play: as thease things that made T-50-2 the tank we know and love, this will be like&#8230; A Stuart of somesort.<br />
-My advice: Grind the Chaffee untill it will be nerfed too. </p>
<p>AND T-50 (tier4) is too really heavily nerfed!! you cannot skid with it anymore. Acceleration is way more slow than before not to mention the top speed! </p>
<p>So WG decided to Nerf badly two of my most played (and loved) tanks in 8.7</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SinSorrow</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-6308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SinSorrow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jul 2013 17:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-6308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Something missing from the comparison: 
Gun depression and elevation?

This acceleration nerf really will affect gameplay, hills, slopes, getting on the move after tracked... 

I have 28tanks in garage of what 18are lights, so one could say that Im a light tank specialist. My most played tanks (by far are T-50 and T-50-2) so this patch really determinates what I think of this game. Downloading the 8.7 Test now, I will do my comparison when I get in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something missing from the comparison:<br />
Gun depression and elevation?</p>
<p>This acceleration nerf really will affect gameplay, hills, slopes, getting on the move after tracked&#8230; </p>
<p>I have 28tanks in garage of what 18are lights, so one could say that Im a light tank specialist. My most played tanks (by far are T-50 and T-50-2) so this patch really determinates what I think of this game. Downloading the 8.7 Test now, I will do my comparison when I get in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lolligheid</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-5611</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lolligheid]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 18:43:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-5611</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What Will be the research Costs of the new tank wil it be the same]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Will be the research Costs of the new tank wil it be the same</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ab</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-4798</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ab]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 14:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-4798</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The idiocy and cluelessness of OP is incredible. Admitting that he has a troll account specifically to make the game a pain in the neck for others, and then complaining about the people who do the same thing he does.

I truly hope the OP gets banned on both his accounts.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The idiocy and cluelessness of OP is incredible. Admitting that he has a troll account specifically to make the game a pain in the neck for others, and then complaining about the people who do the same thing he does.</p>
<p>I truly hope the OP gets banned on both his accounts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-4715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 00:15:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-4715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because they said they want to replace it already Last Thursday?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Because they said they want to replace it already Last Thursday?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: superfun</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-4620</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[superfun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 17:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-4620</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[whats BS is i have a t50-2 with 4 skills and they are only giving  me a 100 % crew member with no perks]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whats BS is i have a t50-2 with 4 skills and they are only giving  me a 100 % crew member with no perks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: energycore</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-4608</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[energycore]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 17:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-4608</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[that&#039;s funny because i&#039;ve been able to hit tanks on the move more so than last patch :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that&#8217;s funny because i&#8217;ve been able to hit tanks on the move more so than last patch :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-4589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Da]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-4589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[nvm... should have reloaded before wirting the comment. my bad]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nvm&#8230; should have reloaded before wirting the comment. my bad</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Da</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-4588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Da]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 16:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-4588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it already know how the change will happen garage-wise: If you have a T50-2 will it be moved, will it become premium like the T34 did, will it be changed to the mt25... will there be free tanks, will other tanks be automatically researched... stuff like that?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it already know how the change will happen garage-wise: If you have a T50-2 will it be moved, will it become premium like the T34 did, will it be changed to the mt25&#8230; will there be free tanks, will other tanks be automatically researched&#8230; stuff like that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muerte92</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/28/mt-25-t-50-2-comparison/#comment-4473</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muerte92]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Jun 2013 11:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=466#comment-4473</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, it&#039;s useless now. It&#039;s got a shitty derp gun, and a shitty 75mm gun.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s useless now. It&#8217;s got a shitty derp gun, and a shitty 75mm gun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
