<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 29.6.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eliminateur</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-5073</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eliminateur]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 12:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-5073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;- according to SerB, in surveys, players actually prefer only partial city maps, not completely covered with streets, so that’s how the devs will do it&quot;
i&#039;m sorry but that&#039;s downright bullshit, i&#039;d love to see those polls because my data shows that everyone wants FULL CITY MAPS.
Even more with the arty infestation that was happening before 8.6, where open maps where useless(and to some extent still are)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- according to SerB, in surveys, players actually prefer only partial city maps, not completely covered with streets, so that’s how the devs will do it&#8221;<br />
i&#8217;m sorry but that&#8217;s downright bullshit, i&#8217;d love to see those polls because my data shows that everyone wants FULL CITY MAPS.<br />
Even more with the arty infestation that was happening before 8.6, where open maps where useless(and to some extent still are)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 【Developer Q&#38;A 】2013/6/28, 6/29– R2D2 &#124; XVM战绩插件中文化团队</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4936</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[【Developer Q&#38;A 】2013/6/28, 6/29– R2D2 &#124; XVM战绩插件中文化团队]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 00:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4936</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 来源：[http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/] 翻译：[http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6350111] [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 来源：[http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/] 翻译：[http://bbs.ngacn.cc/read.php?tid=6350111] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vladis</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4822</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 18:19:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Technically correct, but the actual verb &quot;Nashamanit&#039;&quot; is used in completed, rather than continuous tense (ie &quot;Shamanit&#039; would describe the actual process, while &quot;Nashamanit&#039;&quot; would assume completion of said process with given results)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Technically correct, but the actual verb &#8220;Nashamanit&#8217;&#8221; is used in completed, rather than continuous tense (ie &#8220;Shamanit&#8217; would describe the actual process, while &#8220;Nashamanit&#8217;&#8221; would assume completion of said process with given results)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 10:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At beta times they had much less research done than now, the VK4502s were an acceptable compromise.
Now that they have good sources they can afford to redesign the tree in a more accurate way, IF they won&#039;t do an half assed job like VK7201.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At beta times they had much less research done than now, the VK4502s were an acceptable compromise.<br />
Now that they have good sources they can afford to redesign the tree in a more accurate way, IF they won&#8217;t do an half assed job like VK7201.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4760</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 09:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4760</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#039;s how the historical tree should look like: 
http://zxhistory.blogspot.it/2013/04/extending-wot-german-tech-tree-porsche_22.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s how the historical tree should look like:<br />
<a href="http://zxhistory.blogspot.it/2013/04/extending-wot-german-tech-tree-porsche_22.html" rel="nofollow">http://zxhistory.blogspot.it/2013/04/extending-wot-german-tech-tree-porsche_22.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GeneralDirection</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GeneralDirection]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 09:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4756</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FYI, I made those statements about Missions, not Mugsy_. I don&#039;t want him to be bombarded with a bunch of questions he doesn&#039;t know how to answer, because he&#039;s focused on World of Warplanes right now. :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FYI, I made those statements about Missions, not Mugsy_. I don&#8217;t want him to be bombarded with a bunch of questions he doesn&#8217;t know how to answer, because he&#8217;s focused on World of Warplanes right now. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4741</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 07:07:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tiger II, to be accurate. By &#039;45 nobody considered the original box-on-tracks anything but painfully old-fashioned.
I did get the impression the French were rather more concerned with mobility than the Germans had been though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tiger II, to be accurate. By &#8217;45 nobody considered the original box-on-tracks anything but painfully old-fashioned.<br />
I did get the impression the French were rather more concerned with mobility than the Germans had been though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priory_of_Sion</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4737</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priory_of_Sion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 05:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4737</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hunyi, Wikipedia isn&#039;t a source.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hunyi, Wikipedia isn&#8217;t a source.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 02:20:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Porno Tiger to Ferdinand is perfectly logical given the shared chassis. Oversized paper-project E-75 to nearly two decades newer, very real glass-cannon Leo 1? Gedouddahere.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Porno Tiger to Ferdinand is perfectly logical given the shared chassis. Oversized paper-project E-75 to nearly two decades newer, very real glass-cannon Leo 1? Gedouddahere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherif Rizk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/06/29/29-6-2013/#comment-4728</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sherif Rizk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Jun 2013 02:15:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=484#comment-4728</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Majority of high tier tanks have a common weak spot in almost exact same spot.  If haven&#039;t found it you haven&#039;t reached said tier yet.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Majority of high tier tanks have a common weak spot in almost exact same spot.  If haven&#8217;t found it you haven&#8217;t reached said tier yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
