Comments on: T-34-3 – new premium T8 preview

By: tronicson

tronicson — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:55:01 +0000

nope, 250mm pen (HEAT) you will meet T10 atm

By: tronicson

tronicson — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 13:53:27 +0000

KV-1S looses the 122mm in 8.9 – so it will fit in T6 finally

By: Adrian Bryan

Adrian Bryan — Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:44:25 +0000

Well I will buy the T-34-3 as I like the look of the thing always wanted a Type 59 but know it will never go on sale again I will give this little medium a fair chance. the price will be 7,500 gold I think.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 09:25:20 +0000

I also played my T-34-2 with the 122 and it is DRAMATICALLY worse.

It has almost no gun depression and unless you want to try and snipe people using a gun with the accuracy comparable to a 105mm Derp and the firerate of an Object704 with the penetration of a tier6 tank destroyer, it is ill-advised. The 100mm has much better everything except damage-per-shot, and it can be outdone in damage even by the 100mm with twice the fire rate and 1/4 the ammo cost with no real need for throwing expensive gold ammo.

Plus I don’t know where people are getting unfavourible matchmaking from on the T-34-2 from… I almost always get tier 8, sometimes tier 9, and almost never tier 10 games. I doubt it will have better matchmaking when it has the gold ammo power of a tier10 heavy tank.

By: jewta

jewta — Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:25:06 +0000

I want

By: austin

austin — Fri, 19 Jul 2013 19:49:23 +0000

Can I simply say exactly what a relief to locate someone who in fact knows precisely what theyre discussing on the internet. You actually know how to deliver an issue in order to light and earn it important. More people must read this and understand this facet of the history. I find it difficult to believe you aren’t more popular simply because you definitely possess the gift.

By: Ben

Ben — Fri, 12 Jul 2013 18:40:41 +0000

I got some ingame pictures of it. Its a bit slower than type 59. The supertest has already begun.

If someone want these picture, reply my comment :)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 08 Jul 2013 12:54:56 +0000

By: st380

st380 — Sun, 07 Jul 2013 03:44:56 +0000

pretty sure the Chinese didn’t spend time on putting 122 into a T54 or T34, first improvement was a new 100mm smooth-bore gun based on the type 59′s and used some technology from the 115mm gun on a captured T62 in 1962. they made type 69 and it didn’t work out great,so they put the old 100mm back which created the Type 69 II, later they bought the 105mm L7 and there is the type 69 III(or called type 79),they got 2 120mm gun design,first was not powerful enough second is too big to fit in a tank, so they put it in a TD called type 89.

By: Treborn

Treborn — Sat, 06 Jul 2013 12:22:47 +0000

Im also thinking about the recoil of that gun :)