Comments on: Jagdpanzer from the 70′s – MOWAG Taifun http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: stavro375 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8764 Sat, 13 Jul 2013 01:14:27 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8764 Some of the NA forum’s best players and most regular contributors have been/are very close to being banned due to “moderating for fun” and a screw warning point system, while the NA mod staff runs the boards with an iron fist and seems more interested in preventing intelligent critcism of WG/mod staff decisions than preventing honest-to-god trolling.

I take it that the WG EU mod staff is no more competent?

]]> By: Silentstalker http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8743 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:45:40 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8743 :D :D :D

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8740 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 21:41:33 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8740 While true, so is that just words and not really related to how the tank actually acts in use. Either way ‘MBT’ is not a class used in WoT, so they should just use the one more fitting.

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8699 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:50:30 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8699 ‘Tis a most dreadful tale indeed; one involving a stuffed parrot, a moderator’s pet goldfish, at best semi-legal incendiaries and an Interpol APB…

]]> By: stavro375 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8693 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 19:26:30 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8693 Silentstalker got banned from the EU forums? How did that happen?

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8560 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:23:10 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8560 The mantlet design and the nook in the central glacis to give it some room (compare T110E3) would certainly suggest the gun having some lateral traverse to my amateur eyes…

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8558 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:19:54 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8558 The French seem to like giving their recon stuff that kind of dual-role capability. Started in the later interwar period already (re: Panhard 178 and its 25mm antitank gun).

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8557 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 14:17:23 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8557 Given that the term originates, according to le Wiki, in either Persian or Greek anyway quibbling about different translitterations strikes me as a tad silly. (For the record in my native Finnish it’s rendered as “taifuuni”…)

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8538 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:41:46 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8538 i should also say that sweden never considered the s tank as anything else than a MBT

]]> By: Silentstalker http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/11/jagdpanzer-from-the-70s-mowag-taifun/#comment-8534 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:20:47 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=843#comment-8534 Not that much is known about it, but yes, it most likely did have traverse.

]]>