Comments on: Historical Accuracy: T-50 and Soviet Lights http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: zhelezniye angel http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-10043 Sat, 20 Jul 2013 00:43:57 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-10043 It is rather amusing reading the reasoning behind the developers decisions. Sometimes they use several of these in the same reply.

1. Not historical? But this is a a game not a simulation.

2. We had to rebalance that tank to keep the game playable.

3. The gun on that tank was too much better than the guns on other country tanks.

4. We cannot make that change because then that tank would not be historical.

5. Working as intended.

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9499 Wed, 17 Jul 2013 05:57:31 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9499 ^^

Ahwww….

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9480 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 21:01:49 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9480 That isn’t even remotely resembling an argument.

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9319 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:26:17 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9319 ^^
Aha, that’s more serious!

Germans “terrified”, “unpleasantly surprised”, “horrified” (the list goes on) by underestimating Soviet strength (intel reported 10 000 strong tank force and consequently tank industry , troops encountered 25 000) – yes.

Germans “terrified”, “unpleasantly surprised”, “horrified” (the list goes on) by “legendary” T-34, KV-1 etc. – Hahahaha!! France, anyone?

“Bolsheviks always miss on first shot”

]]> By: Dominatus http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9287 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 01:28:07 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9287 Better than the British where it’s largely “Documentation? What’s documentation?” The Russian, US, and French archives are all very accessible, which is reflected by WG’s research into them. For Germany and Japan though, they rely almost solely on third party research.

]]> By: EnsignExpendable http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9283 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:57:43 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9283 Russian archives are completely open, and easily accessible. It’s no wonder that they have more documents on Soviet tanks than any others.

]]> By: EnsignExpendable http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9282 Tue, 16 Jul 2013 00:56:51 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9282 The Germans had a great time winning the war by clamping their hands over their ears and going “lol Sowjetische Untermenschen”.

Oh wait.

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9274 Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:03:14 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9274 Yes, they do best with Russian tanks!

]]> By: Anonymous http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9273 Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:01:33 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9273 Theoretical accuracy for the win! Aur wepons stronk! That’s why we lost so many tanks – our tactics and weapons, and… everything better than everyone else!

Hahahaha, pure gold!

]]> By: EnsignExpendable http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/14/historical-accuracy-t-50-and-soviet-lights/#comment-9224 Mon, 15 Jul 2013 18:16:38 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=769#comment-9224 They do their best.

]]>