After ten years of going forward it is such an hard task to be achieved? Multicoring. I know that to existing system it is bit trickier, but didn’t quite think it involving so much work. I’d thout still say the benefit is there as there is plenty of those who are on the edge, but are still struggling. And for sure bottleneck for most is not on the GPU side… WoT can go cheap in terms of graphical.

Anyhow I cannot argue about it being hard, but seems there is lack of interest in making the core system better, which is to blame windows for. If it could handle all processors as being one just giving the processor to decide how to divide the tasks across multiples the need for gaming industry doing that would vanish. God knows how much it would suck at first, but when done those 24-cored would already be on the market on double time.

I would thout say that a processor running 10-15 years would increase with less stressing of single core as major core. It is just natural that less component is went under high stress the less it gets exhausted. The difference is something for sure, but how much is no concrete knowledge because there is no need for data of 10 year old processors running 10 more years if there would be main core switching involved.

But I thank you for insight about all this. Cleared much of ‘of the feeling’ stuff to concrete.

If a program (e.g. game) uses multiple threads for different parts of it the Windows can and does schedule different threads on different cores. And this happens with WoT.

>Also running stress on multiple cores increases life time of a processor by exponent…

There is no literature on such a thing, and if there was, I’d know since I’m an electrical engineer. Seimiconductor aging is a very complicated thing. In any case your CPU is good to go for at least a decade even if you overclock. Loading only one core doesn’t accelerate aging, only exceeding TDP.

Lastly, splitting computing load on different threads is no small undertaking, especially on an existing codebase. It could take 20 low-level C++ developers and a multitude of testers months or even a year to do it and make sure the code is at the same quality it originally was.

I’d rather developers worked on new features (HAVOC for example) instead of engaging in a huge undertaking with dubious results.

Kellomies, you should really stand out of your cloud you live on while you bash everything below you, it will come back to haunt you… or already has thus you have to boost yourself to feel equal. *trollface*