Comments on: 25.7.2013

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 27 Jul 2013 21:35:47 +0000

It’s not broken, just not implemented yet.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 26 Jul 2013 00:52:42 +0000

you already say its a rumors..

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:58:48 +0000

Morozov or Kartzev.

By: Russianbias

Russianbias — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:57:30 +0000

Err. Here are actually major rivalry even today between kharkov and tagil factories, between Morozov shool of tank building in Kharkov and Kartzev shool of tank bulding in Tagil. Even today people in runet participate in special olympics on theme of what tanks are better – kharkov’s t-64 and its derivatives or tagil’s t-72 and its derivatives, and who was better designer Morozov or Kartzev. SerB just mistook Omsk with Tagil.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:52:03 +0000

Yep. And BTW here were no major rivalry between kharkov and omsk. But was between kharkov and tagil. Even today people in runet participate in special olympics on theme of what tanks are better – kharkov’s t-64 or tagil’s t-72 and who was better designer

By: Paps_Lv

Paps_Lv — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 20:53:29 +0000

There are rumors about japanese 100 ton tank Mi-To. Is it real, can someone get some info about this ?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 19:40:38 +0000

If its anything like how the B1 is I don’t think that you will have to worry about a Tier 3 “heavy” ruining any games.

By: Captian Nemo

Captian Nemo — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:45:05 +0000

- Object 140 won’t be tier 9, because it’s an Omsk vehicle and SerB states that if they put this tank in a Kharkov branch, they’d probably shoot each other on the respawn point even without the players (SS: there was a rivalry between Omsk and Kharkov teams)

SerB being funny again… Even if his info is a bit off.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:24:39 +0000

Tu čia kaip toks elgiesi kaip tik. Visiems aiškini ką daryt ir t.t. Eilinis kaimo geziukas.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Thu, 25 Jul 2013 17:10:26 +0000

Several real-world militaries would seem to disagree with you over that “no purpose” bit, Anon – not to mention that modern IFVs tend to be well enough armed and armoured to amount to de facto light tanks with infantry-transport capability.