<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 26.7.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: qaz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-12271</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:35:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-12271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeap, the EU thread is still up with WOT Tweaker, the linked on RU forum (which I was always checking first) seems to be down. Why?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeap, the EU thread is still up with WOT Tweaker, the linked on RU forum (which I was always checking first) seems to be down. Why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qaz</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-12270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qaz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 16:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-12270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, SS, could you write more about the Tweaker removal? I&#039;m using it for quite a long time to increase performance, and even saw a version for 8.7 few days ago. What happened?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, SS, could you write more about the Tweaker removal? I&#8217;m using it for quite a long time to increase performance, and even saw a version for 8.7 few days ago. What happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-12153</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-12153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The M60 is given only to good clanwars players however this doesn&#039;t mean that they are good players at all.
Yesterday I had about 20 battles with M60s in and the majority of their drivers failed hard in their gameplay even if they were platooned.
Its easier to win a cw battle with a team you can rely on and a commander that has a well chosen tactic and can reorganize his forces during the battle than being placed with 14 randomly selected players you know nothing about and can hardly communicate with.
So enjoy your special tank but dont be so arrogant to claim that only cw players are the good ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The M60 is given only to good clanwars players however this doesn&#8217;t mean that they are good players at all.<br />
Yesterday I had about 20 battles with M60s in and the majority of their drivers failed hard in their gameplay even if they were platooned.<br />
Its easier to win a cw battle with a team you can rely on and a commander that has a well chosen tactic and can reorganize his forces during the battle than being placed with 14 randomly selected players you know nothing about and can hardly communicate with.<br />
So enjoy your special tank but dont be so arrogant to claim that only cw players are the good ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stronk Tenk</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-12151</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stronk Tenk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 11:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-12151</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Chaffee rebalance means moving up to tier 6 combined with a nerf, right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chaffee rebalance means moving up to tier 6 combined with a nerf, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-12055</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 02:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-12055</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not all undersea cables are alike. Also there are many choke points for undersea cable. 
Older-still
http://www.atlantic-cable.com/Maps/PacificMap.jpg

2008
http://www.neowin.net/images/uploaded/Cable_Map_big.gif

2009
http://thumbnails.visually.netdna-cdn.com/2009-submarine-cable-map_50290b3a74a52.jpg

2011
http://ansonalex.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/underwater-internet-cable-map.jpg?d5aadb]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not all undersea cables are alike. Also there are many choke points for undersea cable.<br />
Older-still<br />
<a href="http://www.atlantic-cable.com/Maps/PacificMap.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.atlantic-cable.com/Maps/PacificMap.jpg</a></p>
<p>2008<br />
<a href="http://www.neowin.net/images/uploaded/Cable_Map_big.gif" rel="nofollow">http://www.neowin.net/images/uploaded/Cable_Map_big.gif</a></p>
<p>2009<br />
<a href="http://thumbnails.visually.netdna-cdn.com/2009-submarine-cable-map_50290b3a74a52.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://thumbnails.visually.netdna-cdn.com/2009-submarine-cable-map_50290b3a74a52.jpg</a></p>
<p>2011<br />
<a href="http://ansonalex.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/underwater-internet-cable-map.jpg?d5aadb" rel="nofollow">http://ansonalex.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/underwater-internet-cable-map.jpg?d5aadb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinez</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-12042</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-12042</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Goddammit, I already plan to own one!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Goddammit, I already plan to own one!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-12022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-12022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[4-5 sheels magazine for 150mm, I dont think so. Maybe hull could bounce, but this tank like most waffentrager have open-top turrent, so very easy to get destory by arty shoot, and for plans ona RU forum, turret of WT were very tiny, 60 mm eaven less, this is not much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4-5 sheels magazine for 150mm, I dont think so. Maybe hull could bounce, but this tank like most waffentrager have open-top turrent, so very easy to get destory by arty shoot, and for plans ona RU forum, turret of WT were very tiny, 60 mm eaven less, this is not much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasileev</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-12013</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vasileev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 21:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-12013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;- apparently (SS: and I have no idea what this means), Wargaming has not given out the “API stats” for M60 and rating sites are not happy about it, on which SerB stated he doesn’t give a damn about&quot;

How nice. Wot developer admitting he does not give a shit about how a feature of his own game works. Api broken . serb doesn&#039;t care. Working as intended]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;- apparently (SS: and I have no idea what this means), Wargaming has not given out the “API stats” for M60 and rating sites are not happy about it, on which SerB stated he doesn’t give a damn about&#8221;</p>
<p>How nice. Wot developer admitting he does not give a shit about how a feature of his own game works. Api broken . serb doesn&#8217;t care. Working as intended</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-11998</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-11998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Read the full text assy...it says &quot;WT E-100&quot;, not E-100...WT=Waffentrager
WT+E-100=Waffentrager E-100, got it now?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Read the full text assy&#8230;it says &#8220;WT E-100&#8243;, not E-100&#8230;WT=Waffentrager<br />
WT+E-100=Waffentrager E-100, got it now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/26/26-7-2013/#comment-11997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alex]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:02:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1190#comment-11997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pop up with 4-5 sheels magazine from a corner, unload them, having a chance to bounce some sheels with the E-100&#039;s armour and than retreat to cover.
Also, don&#039;t forget it has a turret.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pop up with 4-5 sheels magazine from a corner, unload them, having a chance to bounce some sheels with the E-100&#8242;s armour and than retreat to cover.<br />
Also, don&#8217;t forget it has a turret.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
