Comments on: Bovington 2013 video – another copyright fail?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 28 Jul 2013 16:22:19 +0000

What a wierd comment’ I get paid for my job as well but did Wargaming pay him for thirty years service in the British Army, I think not,,,

By: Spine

Spine — Sun, 28 Jul 2013 00:42:35 +0000

The video is now private, Im too late. That’s what I get for enjoying the heat :(

By: Pussy Act of 1930

Pussy Act of 1930 — Sat, 27 Jul 2013 07:16:35 +0000

from the comments here looks like EU folks don’t really understand what copy right and IP is. and i mean the comments that say, hey it’s not really a copy right violation.

plz read about it in the web before looking like fools..

By: Gino Tusconi

Gino Tusconi — Sat, 27 Jul 2013 00:31:42 +0000

Russian’s disregarding copyrights and stealing something? I am utterly “shocked”.

*see what i did there? joke and a jab at the same time!

By: Birdito

Birdito — Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:25:23 +0000

Ahaahaha right?

And tbh I can’t see how this ISN’T for business and promotional use.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 26 Jul 2013 22:09:04 +0000

You would be surprised how many professional youtubers have their videos flagged, even by trolls and cannot resolve these issues even when not having copyrighted content.

By: rtp099

rtp099 — Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:40:14 +0000

WG goes after project tank for copyright infringement but they themselves get caught several times ripping off other’s works of art, music, etc. I think karma is gunning for WG big time!

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 26 Jul 2013 20:07:19 +0000

Meh….there are a bazillion of youtube videos containing copyrighted stuff without giving creditentials and no-one does a shit.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 26 Jul 2013 19:49:38 +0000

If there is an implied value to the advertising (easy to prove if the video goes viral) then yes, it is clearly a use for gain or profit and is subject to copyright laws. Some very thin lines can be crossed if your not careful…

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 26 Jul 2013 16:56:52 +0000

Still, you don’t buy that YouTube video that contains those materials…nothing violated so far.

Only fun thing that you can point out here is the fact that WG, again, uses copyrighted stuff without permission or without giving any credits to the owner.