<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Veider Q&amp;A</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-24123</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 01:55:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-24123</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A buff? YAY!
More power to the Tiger!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A buff? YAY!<br />
More power to the Tiger!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-23032</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:02:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-23032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If the KV-1s is OP, then what does that make the KV-1? Super-OP? Because it&#039;s a lot more noob-friendly (stronger armour, faster loading and more accurate gun)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the KV-1s is OP, then what does that make the KV-1? Super-OP? Because it&#8217;s a lot more noob-friendly (stronger armour, faster loading and more accurate gun)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kuka</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-22255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[kuka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 17:04:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-22255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[sure... get out of ur pretty rubbish kv1s and look around. learn to play without ur op tank]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sure&#8230; get out of ur pretty rubbish kv1s and look around. learn to play without ur op tank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AlbanianCommando</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-15496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[AlbanianCommando]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Aug 2013 01:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-15496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dont nerft KV-1S !!!!! Those who cant beat it are NOOBS!! Every tank has it weakness, learn them and play!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont nerft KV-1S !!!!! Those who cant beat it are NOOBS!! Every tank has it weakness, learn them and play!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yagoot</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-14910</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yagoot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-14910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[abdallah]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>abdallah</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-cigarette</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-14519</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[e-cigarette]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 11:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-14519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am in fact grateful to the owner of this web site who has shared this impressive paragraph at at this place.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am in fact grateful to the owner of this web site who has shared this impressive paragraph at at this place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T3azz (banned)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-14291</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T3azz (banned)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-14291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Speaking about OP TDs,

Look at this:
http://www.noobmeter.com/tankStats/eu

Tier 8 TDs, majority of them are fucking RED, that means they are all underperforming according to stats. So next time you idiot whiners open your mouth, educate yoursefls. Foch 155 might be one fucking TD that performs obove all TDs in terms of stats, and that isnt enough to nerf a whole fucking class of vehicles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Speaking about OP TDs,</p>
<p>Look at this:<br />
<a href="http://www.noobmeter.com/tankStats/eu" rel="nofollow">http://www.noobmeter.com/tankStats/eu</a></p>
<p>Tier 8 TDs, majority of them are fucking RED, that means they are all underperforming according to stats. So next time you idiot whiners open your mouth, educate yoursefls. Foch 155 might be one fucking TD that performs obove all TDs in terms of stats, and that isnt enough to nerf a whole fucking class of vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T3azz (banned)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-13863</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T3azz (banned)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 00:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-13863</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Noobmeter has tank stats also, not only people whos name has been searched. Vdaddict or that other site has similar numbers for tanks, and you see the same pattern there. A bunch of heavy tanks beeing OP, not only TDs, in terms of WR.

How is it a conspiracy to say that WG dont look at stats when balancing tanks? This is pure fucking fact. It has been numerous of statements from WG devs that when ever a change is made, it is to make it &quot;balanced&quot;, despite those tanks werent OP according to stats. They may call it historical balance or other bullshit explenations. 

Just like the arty, never were OP according to stats, but the massive whine from the community made them change it. Just like the fucking T57 and Foch 155, they said they werent going to be nerfed, it was just a false rumor. Later on devs said those tanks might get nerfed. Same as with the Kv1s. Just look at threads at the forums, most whine are about TDs, and autloaders. 

I see a fucking pattern here, everybody knew TDs were the next vehicles to be whined about, now when artys are nerfed. It is a generall tendency to whine about all tanks that arnt heavy, medium or light, as WOT community has a bias towards these type of tanks. Just look at vehicles played, the highest amout are heavys, and therfore the community expect those to be best, and all other tanks that performs good (despite not beein OP according to stats) must be nerfed. 

And of course, autloaders, these are also special in that way that they punish idiots standing infront of tanks while reloading.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noobmeter has tank stats also, not only people whos name has been searched. Vdaddict or that other site has similar numbers for tanks, and you see the same pattern there. A bunch of heavy tanks beeing OP, not only TDs, in terms of WR.</p>
<p>How is it a conspiracy to say that WG dont look at stats when balancing tanks? This is pure fucking fact. It has been numerous of statements from WG devs that when ever a change is made, it is to make it &#8220;balanced&#8221;, despite those tanks werent OP according to stats. They may call it historical balance or other bullshit explenations. </p>
<p>Just like the arty, never were OP according to stats, but the massive whine from the community made them change it. Just like the fucking T57 and Foch 155, they said they werent going to be nerfed, it was just a false rumor. Later on devs said those tanks might get nerfed. Same as with the Kv1s. Just look at threads at the forums, most whine are about TDs, and autloaders. </p>
<p>I see a fucking pattern here, everybody knew TDs were the next vehicles to be whined about, now when artys are nerfed. It is a generall tendency to whine about all tanks that arnt heavy, medium or light, as WOT community has a bias towards these type of tanks. Just look at vehicles played, the highest amout are heavys, and therfore the community expect those to be best, and all other tanks that performs good (despite not beein OP according to stats) must be nerfed. </p>
<p>And of course, autloaders, these are also special in that way that they punish idiots standing infront of tanks while reloading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-13810</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 20:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-13810</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;In other words, WG dont look at stats when nerfing/buffing tanks, which the community are fooled into believing, just so they can play their immaginary “balanced” game&quot; amounts to pure ERMAHGERD CNSPRICY tinhattery in my books, thanks. Also am I remembering wrong or don&#039;t the Noobmeter numbers *only* include people whose names have been searched for at least once?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In other words, WG dont look at stats when nerfing/buffing tanks, which the community are fooled into believing, just so they can play their immaginary “balanced” game&#8221; amounts to pure ERMAHGERD CNSPRICY tinhattery in my books, thanks. Also am I remembering wrong or don&#8217;t the Noobmeter numbers *only* include people whose names have been searched for at least once?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T3azz (banned)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/29/veider-qa/#comment-13773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T3azz (banned)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1252#comment-13773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And who are you refering to? Tinfoil people are those who believe T57 and Foch 155 are OP because they:

A: Disslike beeing owned by them due to poor gameplay
B: Think stats on sites like noobmeter is the ultimate thruth.

How ever, looking at other tanks on noobmeter, one will soon realise that there are alot other tanks which also fills the criteria for OP ness, these arnt TDs, they are heavys. 

Tinfoil people are also those that knows their beloved heavys are OP in all aspects, but rather blame other kind of tanks just because the general trend is to blame those. Before it was artys, now its TDs and also autloader tanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And who are you refering to? Tinfoil people are those who believe T57 and Foch 155 are OP because they:</p>
<p>A: Disslike beeing owned by them due to poor gameplay<br />
B: Think stats on sites like noobmeter is the ultimate thruth.</p>
<p>How ever, looking at other tanks on noobmeter, one will soon realise that there are alot other tanks which also fills the criteria for OP ness, these arnt TDs, they are heavys. </p>
<p>Tinfoil people are also those that knows their beloved heavys are OP in all aspects, but rather blame other kind of tanks just because the general trend is to blame those. Before it was artys, now its TDs and also autloader tanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
