<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Possible Chinese SPG line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ariyasak</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-17715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ariyasak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Aug 2013 10:13:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-17715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OMG!The tier 9
another version of crusander SP?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG!The tier 9<br />
another version of crusander SP?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strawdogg</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-14412</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[strawdogg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-14412</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the more arty the better,, frakin campers nitemare..I love it hell from the heavens,,..let it rain lead...eheheheheehehehehehe...yes..doom]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the more arty the better,, frakin campers nitemare..I love it hell from the heavens,,..let it rain lead&#8230;eheheheheehehehehehe&#8230;yes..doom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TK3600</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-13719</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TK3600]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 17:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-13719</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I know, Type77 and BTR are very different. Even though their ancesters are similar, but Type77 was purely developed by Chinese.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I know, Type77 and BTR are very different. Even though their ancesters are similar, but Type77 was purely developed by Chinese.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zatiria</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-13553</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zatiria]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:45:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-13553</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually that BTR-50-based SPG is probably based on the Type 77 APC which is not a copy of the Soviet BTR-50. It&#039;s development history is very interesting: First the PRC obtained a couple PT-76 tanks in the 1950s and decided to create their own amphibious light tank which resulted in the Type 60. This tank wasn&#039;t very successful however and it eventually led to the development of the Type 63 which entered service in large numbers and is still used by the PLA today (although it did go through a very extensive modernization program). Later they developed an amphibious APC based on the Type 63 which entered service as Type 77.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually that BTR-50-based SPG is probably based on the Type 77 APC which is not a copy of the Soviet BTR-50. It&#8217;s development history is very interesting: First the PRC obtained a couple PT-76 tanks in the 1950s and decided to create their own amphibious light tank which resulted in the Type 60. This tank wasn&#8217;t very successful however and it eventually led to the development of the Type 63 which entered service in large numbers and is still used by the PLA today (although it did go through a very extensive modernization program). Later they developed an amphibious APC based on the Type 63 which entered service as Type 77.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sedia</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-13471</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sedia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-13471</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[т 34 122 siria it will be interesting spg but not chinese!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>т 34 122 siria it will be interesting spg but not chinese!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-13457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-13457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[teda 63-122 :) jako podvozek typu 83 to nevypadá :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>teda 63-122 :) jako podvozek typu 83 to nevypadá :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-13454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:18:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-13454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[jo aha :) už jsem si to našel název je 83-122 :D
jinak osobně věřím, že se povede najít ještě nějaký dobrý SPG, neboť Čína je veliká a návrhů tam padlo určitě veliké množství]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jo aha :) už jsem si to našel název je 83-122 :D<br />
jinak osobně věřím, že se povede najít ještě nějaký dobrý SPG, neboť Čína je veliká a návrhů tam padlo určitě veliké množství</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silentstalker</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-13450</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silentstalker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-13450</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[TK3600 je čínský poster, co tu větev přeložil z čínštiny :) Rok bohužel důležitý taky je, momentálně je hranice nastavena na rok 1969.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TK3600 je čínský poster, co tu větev přeložil z čínštiny :) Rok bohužel důležitý taky je, momentálně je hranice nastavena na rok 1969.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-13436</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 10:27:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-13436</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And NO for stupidity?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And NO for stupidity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/30/possible-chinese-spg-line/#comment-13420</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jul 2013 09:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1278#comment-13420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[spíše bych tam čekal TK3600?? jestli je to pravý název. Ono ani o rok původu tanku nejde (jestli je ze 60. či 80. let), neboť stejně WG ty tanky vyváží.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>spíše bych tam čekal TK3600?? jestli je to pravý název. Ono ani o rok původu tanku nejde (jestli je ze 60. či 80. let), neboť stejně WG ty tanky vyváží.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
