Comments on: 31.7.2013 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: VonSammich http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14732 Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:45:57 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14732 I welcome all new french tanks… especially ones that can finally take a hit… I want my 2c to brawl with things, instead of relying on an autoloader to kick ass.

]]> By: Rakyth http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14537 Thu, 01 Aug 2013 12:12:21 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14537 - premium tanks with more guns (as in, you can choose a gun) will not be implemented

I agree with that decision completely, but boy do I wish otherwise.

]]> By: Vollketten http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14355 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 19:46:34 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14355 It was an experimental vehicle. Have you got a source for an alternate turret?

]]> By: Zarax http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14276 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:40:33 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14276 Think GW (E) with GW P turret and going 40kmh, that is WG abomination coming.

]]> By: Zarax http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14275 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:38:11 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14275 It’s not E-100′s hull, more like GW E one.

]]> By: Zarax http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14273 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:37:00 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14273 I mean VK100.01 (P), which is what WG mistook as VK7201.
Also, Maus II on tier X could be good with Maus at tier IX.

]]> By: Medjed http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14256 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:08:46 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14256 I wonder how german autoloader TDs will behave…foch155 has epic frontal armor and speed, cammo is also great…so i am wondering what pros will german have since it will have shitty armor and shitty mobility, and everything that has e100 in it is countering with the word cammo…only thing that could save it is the gun, but somehow i really doubt it will be any better than foch,,,long reload will still be long, aimtime would might be slightly better, and accuracy, but it still will be worse than 155

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14234 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 15:18:41 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14234 Would be kinda sad (and probably bad for business) if they never had changes of heart.

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14194 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:31:04 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14194 Although IIRC the ‘Tilda turret was just a placeholder.

]]> By: Fuzzy http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/31-7-2013/#comment-14174 Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:37:55 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1305#comment-14174 Why not the TOG-I?

It makes perfect sense, we know what gun it has, we know what turret it has and roughly how fast and armoured the TOG’s are, (very slow and no armour)

There is literally no reason it can’t be put in quickly and easily. The TOG-II is a huge success vehicle for them, why not then?

]]>