<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WG silently changed CW rules</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 21:19:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEA/ASIA here. It turns out that we have the exactly same problem after the map wipe: Suddenly it&#039;s written that draw is the attacker&#039;s victory.

I didn&#039;t have a chance to see the real result of draw, though. My clan was in an inferior situation when defending one of our provinces due to lack of T10 players in that timezone (we can&#039;t even hold it till draw), while the other map is not attacked :/

All of this happened when the forum is under maintenance...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEA/ASIA here. It turns out that we have the exactly same problem after the map wipe: Suddenly it&#8217;s written that draw is the attacker&#8217;s victory.</p>
<p>I didn&#8217;t have a chance to see the real result of draw, though. My clan was in an inferior situation when defending one of our provinces due to lack of T10 players in that timezone (we can&#8217;t even hold it till draw), while the other map is not attacked :/</p>
<p>All of this happened when the forum is under maintenance&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14730</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimitri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 18:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14730</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[thanks?
All I am saying is - it is not a rule change as has been posted, it is not a consistent bug to my knowledge. Claiming it is a rule change and broadcasting that is mis-information.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks?<br />
All I am saying is &#8211; it is not a rule change as has been posted, it is not a consistent bug to my knowledge. Claiming it is a rule change and broadcasting that is mis-information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle J</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14446</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncle J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 04:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14446</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d say go fuck yourself with &quot;is being addressed&quot;! That bug was already there more than a year ago, mr. WG PR-poster...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say go fuck yourself with &#8220;is being addressed&#8221;! That bug was already there more than a year ago, mr. WG PR-poster&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dimitri</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dimitri]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Aug 2013 00:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[uh this is a bug with a few maps on CW that is being addressed.
Perhaps you should change your topic to reflect WG EUs response about fixing the bug, not that the rules were changed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>uh this is a bug with a few maps on CW that is being addressed.<br />
Perhaps you should change your topic to reflect WG EUs response about fixing the bug, not that the rules were changed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Homer_J</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14423</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Homer_J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 22:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14423</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FTR news fail again.

This blog gets more tabloid by the day.

WG didn&#039;t change the rules, they just screwed up.  Some supposedly intelligent  people in supposedly top clans didn&#039;t bother to read the conditions of battle and lost a province because of it. Well boo hoo, WG made the same screw up before, you should pay more attention.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FTR news fail again.</p>
<p>This blog gets more tabloid by the day.</p>
<p>WG didn&#8217;t change the rules, they just screwed up.  Some supposedly intelligent  people in supposedly top clans didn&#8217;t bother to read the conditions of battle and lost a province because of it. Well boo hoo, WG made the same screw up before, you should pay more attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uncle J</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14200</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Uncle J]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;but It wouldn’t make any sense to make that kind of rule modification.&quot;

Hey, it is not like something has to make sense to WG to do it :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;but It wouldn’t make any sense to make that kind of rule modification.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hey, it is not like something has to make sense to WG to do it :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14190</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[D]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14190</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like it.
Please keep it so, WG.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like it.<br />
Please keep it so, WG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAMN</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14172</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAMN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14172</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Damn, wrong link, here is the post you should look at:

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/276529-i-love-when-wg-change-rules-without-say-anything/page__st__100__pid__5431930#entry5431930]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, wrong link, here is the post you should look at:</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/276529-i-love-when-wg-change-rules-without-say-anything/page__st__100__pid__5431930#entry5431930" rel="nofollow">http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/276529-i-love-when-wg-change-rules-without-say-anything/page__st__100__pid__5431930#entry5431930</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CAMN</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14171</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CAMN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 13:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SS, it seems it was all a mistake:

http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/276529-i-love-when-wg-change-rules-without-say-anything/

I remember winning land in NA once for something like that. Bugs are funny sometimes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SS, it seems it was all a mistake:</p>
<p><a href="http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/276529-i-love-when-wg-change-rules-without-say-anything/" rel="nofollow">http://forum.worldoftanks.eu/index.php?/topic/276529-i-love-when-wg-change-rules-without-say-anything/</a></p>
<p>I remember winning land in NA once for something like that. Bugs are funny sometimes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dont_Stop</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/07/31/wg-silently-changed-cw-rules/#comment-14147</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dont_Stop]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Jul 2013 12:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1317#comment-14147</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is ridiculous. The defending team has to attack? If wg wants more rapid land owner change they have to consider that lands are for good organized teams and not for everyone.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ridiculous. The defending team has to attack? If wg wants more rapid land owner change they have to consider that lands are for good organized teams and not for everyone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
