Comments on: 1.8.2013

By: phil

phil — Sun, 04 Aug 2013 02:38:02 +0000

I didn’t know that… hmmm that’s disappointing.

I was hoping they would be able to pull it off… I personally thought they would make the time scales differ to do it – as in several air battles to take place in repetition over one tank battle and several tank battles could take place over one naval battle all on the same map with ‘local’ and “global” victories and/or defeats.

They should still try, as for me the scope and theater of WT was the major appeal … one can hope … man that flight model gets under my skin – I was hoping to drive the ships and tanks in WT and AAA some of those keyboard/mouse Ai assisted aircraft. Oh well heres hoping for larger maps someday in WOT

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 23:33:23 +0000

See? You are giving an example all by yourself…

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 20:10:24 +0000

…what the Hell are you even talking about?

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 20:09:02 +0000

>implying lotteries are rigged

The limits of your ability do not equal loaded dice, dumbass.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 19:44:07 +0000

WT is storm? Game are practically dead already xD

By: Jiri_Starrider

Jiri_Starrider — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 16:13:38 +0000

You’re not in the minority. WT had some good things going for it, map sizes and fidelity (accurate modeling of real locations), I liked the garage battle style, but ya, flying? Not so much. And the Pay to Win aspects of it I could do without. Plus apparently they are giving up on the combined arms aspect of things. I guess tanks are still coming, but they won’t be on the same field as planes.

By: Jiri_Starrider

Jiri_Starrider — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 16:09:20 +0000

I’m still not getting any read of benevolence there, you are over interpreting the comments IMO. SerB made the game (I know it wasn’t a solo effort) someone comes and kicks sand in his face, he has the power to do something about it. It’s within the rules anyway (insults towards devs, etc). The situation was when he is specifically targeted because of who he is. And besides, rules or not, what’s the point of power if you can’t abuse it?

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 13:03:34 +0000

And then AMX 30 at Tier 10. Would be pretty slim tree indeed.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:00:49 +0000

I think it’s high time to ask: are there percentage points or percentages? It’s incredibly common to mix these two, especially for kids and it’s easy to miss something in translation. Or even some SerBalikes are not educated enough and don’t know what they say (or what they calculate and what errors they make)?

Ingame crew skills are additive and that means percentage points. I still don’t know penalty/bonus values for camo – wiki says “percentage” but i strongly suspect percentage points there, too.

Anyway, when you consider WG and numbers, you have to be very careful and don’t believe anything you get from them…

By: delaBoujardiere

delaBoujardiere — Fri, 02 Aug 2013 08:04:09 +0000

If TK SerB results in perma-ban then its all worth it.
I uninstalled the game a couple of weeks ago due to 80% of game is filled with neverending idiots either in own team or enemy.
I do not know who is worse the siemka’s or the ahoi’s.. Still there were those moments when i ended teaming up with some good polish or other nation whom really understanded each others vision by filling up each of others cons and pros during the game and actually turned the tide of the game. But how often are those moments?? When checking the post-game stats there is always 5-6 players with zero-damage and thats their contribute to that game..
What is the point winning or losing 15-2?? Why is it that my WN6/7 has been increasing well while my WR still is refused to improve? ( just check my stats at noobmeter or what soever..). The simple answer is: the game is rigged like a lottery. Anyone who refuse to admit that are simply too addicted to this game.