Comments on: Lorraine 40t depression not historical?

By: energycore

energycore — Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:08:34 +0000

They said AMX-13-105 is too modern (it has too modern sights and other things i can’t remember) and that’s why they won’t implement it.

After all, it is a model from the 80s

By: energycore

energycore — Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:05:59 +0000

Leo is your best passive scout? Allow me to introduce you to the invisibatchat.

By: energycore

energycore — Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:05:16 +0000

- Seems like historical accuracy is used only when it suits WG.

We already knew that ;)

By: energycore

energycore — Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:04:36 +0000

Want realism? Join the Army

By: energycore

energycore — Tue, 06 Aug 2013 00:01:19 +0000

British tanks have accurate guns with good aiming times – they can afford to chill farther in the back where their big sillhouettes won’t give them that much trouble. On the other hand, the lorraine aims very slowly (a parameter placed there to balance autoloader sniping) and isn’t very accurate in the first place.

Not to mention the fact that a static lorraine is a piece of cake for arty.

By: iddqd

iddqd — Mon, 05 Aug 2013 23:32:14 +0000

it used to have way more depression when it came out on the test server, until they eventually nerfed it

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:42:33 +0000

Don’t see what would, the whole loading mechanism is contained in the turret bustle.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:39:08 +0000

Only the AMX-13 was reloaded from the outside, its bigger cousins don’t even have the necessary access hatches over the barillets.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 05 Aug 2013 22:29:11 +0000

Even with -10 it will be shit tank

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 05 Aug 2013 19:00:56 +0000

Are we sure that when they switched from semiautomatic loading to automatic one they didn’t change anything in the turret which could have compromised that -8 depression?