Comments on: 9.8.2013

By: Sgt_Varik

Sgt_Varik — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:24:45 +0000

I miss the days when WG actually cared enough of their players to compensate them for doing stuff like this.

By: Vasileev

Vasileev — Sat, 10 Aug 2013 17:46:05 +0000

This sucks. Every other tank line that has been changed like this so far has resulted players getting free replacement tanks. Like when the kv and kv3 tanks changed, or when the amx 12t line was changed and players got free elc amx.

It is only fair that players should get the new t6 tank for free because essentially they have paid for it when they bought this crap bucket that is also know as 3001h. Now when the 3001h drops down a tier the players who bought 3001h lose their tier 6 tank from that line and also lose the resale value of that tank as well. For players who bought 3001h just to grind through it this means literally that you have buy the same tank twice.

Typically retarded wg decisions…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 Aug 2013 12:54:36 +0000

Damn, that’d be worth it…

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 Aug 2013 02:57:21 +0000

Cool Story Woras :)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 10 Aug 2013 02:56:21 +0000

Cool story bro :)

By: NobAkimoto

NobAkimoto — Fri, 09 Aug 2013 23:51:23 +0000

So far as I can tell based on the ship silhouettes (they’re not full models btw, just cutouts) they’re from left to right:
Iowa, either a Bismarck or King George V(Not enough detail), Yamato, another Iowa.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:09:02 +0000

Sov tanks tend to have no gundep anyway, so I suspect the usual problems of rear turret aren’t as salient.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 09 Aug 2013 19:07:38 +0000

And KV-1/2 is TOTALLY similar to T-43. Or even an IS for that matter.

By: energycore

energycore — Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:56:31 +0000

oh i’m sorry, i didn’t realize the KV-5 plays exactly the same way as the IS-7 and the T-54

By: energycore

energycore — Fri, 09 Aug 2013 18:55:41 +0000

WG said afterwards that they would never do that again