Comments on: VK3001P on tier 5?

By: annaconda

annaconda — Fri, 27 Sep 2013 20:07:38 +0000

i say teir6 heav 105 with similar stats (hard and soft) to the ARL’s 105 and its own turrent…. but any gun but the 75L48 reqiures second suspension (there needs to be a stock grind). lolz sounds like another T150 i agree and have the 105L47 replace the panzer4′s derp on tigerP making it like the KV3.(troll moment) make the teir 8 like super heavy (KV4) make the 9 the maus (ST1 got downd i think) and to top it of… maus2 with 15cm gun

By: Cyttorak

Cyttorak — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 16:58:44 +0000

I see :(

By: Daigensui

Daigensui — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 14:50:29 +0000

To all the retards that thing VK 30.01 (P) should get the L/52: All Krupp did was show some penetration numbers. There was no serious proposal to arm Typ 100 with a 10.5 cm gun at any point.

By: T3azz (banned)

T3azz (banned) — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 13:49:27 +0000

No 105mm dude, Dicker Max is a TD and should have a more powerful gun. Dont fucking compare heavy tanks with TDs, they should never have guns that are fucking close to TDs anyways.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:14:26 +0000

In my opinion it depends on the rearrangement of the vk4502 series.
If the vk4502 ausf. b gets only one tier lower than now, then i think the vk3001p will stay at tier 6, but if they decide to get the vk4502 with changeable hulls down to tier 7, then they will bring the tiger P as a new tier 6 and the vk3001p as a tier 5.

But that would be the a massive rearrangement in the techtree, so i don’t know if they realy would do sth like that.
For now i agree, that the vk3001p will stay. But things can change quickly when the topic of the rearrangement get’s closer to its implementation.

@SS did you hear anything new (rumors) regarding the VK4502 rearrangement? :)
Thanks in advance

By: TK3600

TK3600 — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:08:24 +0000

It can’t reach that speed in game with the crappy engine. If top speed is something to worry about, then why IS7 is not trolling every medium tanks? Why AMX40 is not the most OP tank ever?

By: TK3600

TK3600 — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 07:04:53 +0000

Here is an idea, make armor, weight, engine historical, and give it the 105 gun. You get a tank with paper armor, boom stick, that is slightly faster than heavy. No, 105mm will not be OP. Dickermax already have it at tier6. Kv1S got much more superiour armor, bigger gun, more hitpoint, while being only little bit slower. What new VK3001P got to beat KV1S is the better reload speed, little bit faster, better accuracy, while the dpm and aim time is almost the same. One can still argue that KV1S is better. Sounds very balanced to me. Don’t forget, gun isn’t the only thing a tank have. Givr BL10 to any other tier8 tank can nake it OP, but just not on ISU152.

By: Daigensui

Daigensui — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 04:09:10 +0000

SS, can you find me the source of the supposed 50 mm armor VK 30.01 (P)? All my sources indicates 70 mm to be the frontal armor as of March 5, 1941.

By: ArmageddonEvil

ArmageddonEvil — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 01:22:40 +0000

You will have to create an RU server account and type in Russian….

By: ClassicFrog

ClassicFrog — Sun, 11 Aug 2013 23:20:13 +0000

Wasn’t there few meds having heavier MM weight than other meds of same tier? Indien Panzer was one of them I think. It means devs could assign MM weight individually and thus balancing out the 88mm gun.