Comments on: VK3001P article errata

By: HarbingerZero

HarbingerZero — Tue, 13 Aug 2013 14:04:02 +0000

Any idea about hatches for the driver and radioman? That drives me nuts on the 30.01P and the 45.02A – I can’t imagine that the designs called for no hatches other than the ones on the turret, and yet none are modeled in game. Do you know of any information in the drawings or research about them? I know the Tiger P seems to model them on the side of the hull, much like the 30.02 DB…that would seem to be the most likely place.

By: Ankken

Ankken — Tue, 13 Aug 2013 13:28:37 +0000

yeah the short 88 (220dmg/132mm pen) is very comparable to the 90mm DCA 30 (240dmg/135mm pen), which the BDR G1B has at T5.

By: ROMEU

ROMEU — Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:37:42 +0000

How Much is the gun depression of this beast?And from VK 3001(H)?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 13 Aug 2013 11:37:14 +0000

Just because it compares to the kv-1, doesn’t mean it should be tier v. In tier vi we have the kv-1s with worse armor, the kv-2 with the same hull, the arl with only a good front plate, the 3601h, the m6… There’s a whole tech tree to fill.

By: Silty

Silty — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 22:43:50 +0000

Yeah, it’s totally tier 5 level armor for a heavy, I’d even say slightly below average. The KV-1 has much more because a 15mm difference is huge for side armor, plus it also has super-absorbent tracks.

By: Anti communist

Anti communist — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:24:35 +0000

I did. She didn’t take it well(if you know what i mean).

By: Silentstalker

Silentstalker — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:22:29 +0000

It was developed in late 1942 and saw service in 1943.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:17:44 +0000

Developement date. After all if the L/48 would be a bit anachronistic…

By: Silentstalker

Silentstalker — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:14:47 +0000

Well… probably, but I think there are better candidates for that position. Typ 101 comes in mind.

By: Kazomir

Kazomir — Mon, 12 Aug 2013 20:14:19 +0000

What do you mean by vintage.