<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 14.8.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoserDestiny</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21732</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LoserDestiny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 13:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21732</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well yes, there is only 1 branch yet implemented...

But there are 2 good candidates for a 2nd and 3d branch with T95 med and T77 drum loader med.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well yes, there is only 1 branch yet implemented&#8230;</p>
<p>But there are 2 good candidates for a 2nd and 3d branch with T95 med and T77 drum loader med.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[-Storm admits that the frontal IS-4 armor slope (61 degrees) is not correct in game, it differs by a few degrees, it will be fixed in the future
-Storm on MM: “At this moment, there are some problems with the matchmaker, which cause it to sometimes disregard some MM rules. It’s connected with high server loads. We know about the problems and they will be fixed in next patch”

Is it their stupidity,is it the incompetence or are they just downright liars?
Not once previously BOTH issues have been asked about,YET on ALL occassions they have categorically denied that IS-4 has problem with front angle as well as MM having some issues.

That`s WG at it`s best.

petya75]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-Storm admits that the frontal IS-4 armor slope (61 degrees) is not correct in game, it differs by a few degrees, it will be fixed in the future<br />
-Storm on MM: “At this moment, there are some problems with the matchmaker, which cause it to sometimes disregard some MM rules. It’s connected with high server loads. We know about the problems and they will be fixed in next patch”</p>
<p>Is it their stupidity,is it the incompetence or are they just downright liars?<br />
Not once previously BOTH issues have been asked about,YET on ALL occassions they have categorically denied that IS-4 has problem with front angle as well as MM having some issues.</p>
<p>That`s WG at it`s best.</p>
<p>petya75</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21539</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have stopped reading here:&quot;T30′s first shoot on me from 800 m &quot; Nice trolling mate...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have stopped reading here:&#8221;T30′s first shoot on me from 800 m &#8221; Nice trolling mate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MesoTroniK</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21535</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MesoTroniK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 06:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21535</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has -4 degree gun depression, &quot;hur dur&quot;...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has -4 degree gun depression, &#8220;hur dur&#8221;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 05:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From what I&#039;ve read some US tankers conversely swore by them, and Germans were apparently sometimes a bit jealous of the tricks a skilled gunner could pull with them.
Also probably noteworthy that just about everybody at least *planned* to add stabilisers to their tanks sooner or later...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From what I&#8217;ve read some US tankers conversely swore by them, and Germans were apparently sometimes a bit jealous of the tricks a skilled gunner could pull with them.<br />
Also probably noteworthy that just about everybody at least *planned* to add stabilisers to their tanks sooner or later&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lito</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21530</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lito]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 05:39:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daedal. You can pen IS-7 flatter part in front of the turret with T10 guns too, people are just too stupid to notice that. Since T10 TD&#039;s it is actually pretty easy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daedal. You can pen IS-7 flatter part in front of the turret with T10 guns too, people are just too stupid to notice that. Since T10 TD&#8217;s it is actually pretty easy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cwjian90</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21522</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cwjian90]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:51:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21522</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you don&#039;t mind, I can answer those based on previous FTR posts:
1) Amphibious tanks will only be considered once they add much larger maps.
2) They will add them if they can find suitable ones, although WG apparently has trouble with that.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you don&#8217;t mind, I can answer those based on previous FTR posts:<br />
1) Amphibious tanks will only be considered once they add much larger maps.<br />
2) They will add them if they can find suitable ones, although WG apparently has trouble with that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21513</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 03:06:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21513</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SS, a bit off topic, but has SerB said anything about if any amphibious light tanks will be added? Or if tier 10 lights will be added?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SS, a bit off topic, but has SerB said anything about if any amphibious light tanks will be added? Or if tier 10 lights will be added?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert Livingston</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21505</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robert Livingston]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 02:44:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21505</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US trained gunners for gyrostabilizer shooting but the device was very difficult to keep in adjustment in actual combat, and was usually disconnected.  Granted they could work theoretically to increase ht % while moving, but they were little used and other nations didn&#039;t have them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US trained gunners for gyrostabilizer shooting but the device was very difficult to keep in adjustment in actual combat, and was usually disconnected.  Granted they could work theoretically to increase ht % while moving, but they were little used and other nations didn&#8217;t have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: martinez</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/14/14-8-2013/#comment-21474</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[martinez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 00:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1697#comment-21474</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[- Q: “A kill should be awarded to the player, that did most of the damage, not the one who finished a 1hp tank!” A: “Injustice!!!555555+″

fixed for ya]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- Q: “A kill should be awarded to the player, that did most of the damage, not the one who finished a 1hp tank!” A: “Injustice!!!555555+″</p>
<p>fixed for ya</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
