<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 15.8.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your NightMARE</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-22576</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Your NightMARE]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 13:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-22576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;&quot;- Q: “Will the national voiceovers be different from voiceovers in mods?” A: “Yes, a lot, considering the fact the only mod voiceover I’ve heard is the one with my little pony voices”&quot;&quot;
Aww, too bad! And here I thought they would take inspiration from one of the best mods out there...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8221;- Q: “Will the national voiceovers be different from voiceovers in mods?” A: “Yes, a lot, considering the fact the only mod voiceover I’ve heard is the one with my little pony voices”&#8221;&#8221;<br />
Aww, too bad! And here I thought they would take inspiration from one of the best mods out there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krazypenguin</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-22036</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[krazypenguin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 07:23:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-22036</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Made me laugh too.

I know it&#039;s not really a serious queston but the serious answer, in case anyone really cares, is - he looked where the interviewer told him to.  

I recently did a video interview for WG and was specifically told NOT to look at the camera but to just look at the interviewer.  It puts the speaker at ease and makes them seem more natural.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Made me laugh too.</p>
<p>I know it&#8217;s not really a serious queston but the serious answer, in case anyone really cares, is &#8211; he looked where the interviewer told him to.  </p>
<p>I recently did a video interview for WG and was specifically told NOT to look at the camera but to just look at the interviewer.  It puts the speaker at ease and makes them seem more natural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baske_74</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-22024</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baske_74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 06:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-22024</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[since when has WG evenr given clear and complete change logs what they are about to do. you can ever be sure when the test is completed and the next patch goes lives they keep chaning stuff all the time.

a lot of stats have been leaked for the USSR additions in 0.8.8 but only screenies of the German additions. the secondary German TD line has been mentioned as early as OB and its still not here. if you dont count the JPII and D-Max that is ;)

all info about this game in advance comes from sites like this and &quot;LEAKS&quot; from Super testers.

huge fans of the game and collectors of certain trees or vehicles, like me ;) want to know in advance where new vehicles are added and under what condidtion, so Xp can be collected on the previous vehicles.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>since when has WG evenr given clear and complete change logs what they are about to do. you can ever be sure when the test is completed and the next patch goes lives they keep chaning stuff all the time.</p>
<p>a lot of stats have been leaked for the USSR additions in 0.8.8 but only screenies of the German additions. the secondary German TD line has been mentioned as early as OB and its still not here. if you dont count the JPII and D-Max that is ;)</p>
<p>all info about this game in advance comes from sites like this and &#8220;LEAKS&#8221; from Super testers.</p>
<p>huge fans of the game and collectors of certain trees or vehicles, like me ;) want to know in advance where new vehicles are added and under what condidtion, so Xp can be collected on the previous vehicles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baske_74</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-22022</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baske_74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 06:24:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-22022</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[when i watched the video concerning 0.8.8, it was stated that the Vk 36.01h would be converted to a heavy with minmal stat changes. (what ever that means ;)
the Vk30.01h would be &quot;balanced&quot; for T5 HT duty.

the removal of the un-historical engines from panther variants and possibly tiger would not hinder the vehicles mobilty and they will  be compensated by a reduction in terrain resistance if engine power was lowered due to the removal of the engine.

if i remember correctly the tigers will get a top speed boost so they can achieve their historical all be it theoretical top speeds, without the addition of more HP so accelleration stays the same.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>when i watched the video concerning 0.8.8, it was stated that the Vk 36.01h would be converted to a heavy with minmal stat changes. (what ever that means ;)<br />
the Vk30.01h would be &#8220;balanced&#8221; for T5 HT duty.</p>
<p>the removal of the un-historical engines from panther variants and possibly tiger would not hinder the vehicles mobilty and they will  be compensated by a reduction in terrain resistance if engine power was lowered due to the removal of the engine.</p>
<p>if i remember correctly the tigers will get a top speed boost so they can achieve their historical all be it theoretical top speeds, without the addition of more HP so accelleration stays the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Baske_74</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-22015</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Baske_74]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 06:11:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-22015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Leopard Prototype B won’t come as a premium, but it’s possible it will come as a hull option for Leopard PTA

is this a feature they will implement for multiple vehicles within a tree or just for a few select ones that actually have the mutiple hulls developed. also nice option with this feature is too give this option to the ferdinand and allow the upgrade into the elefant which is as historical as you can get. this can also be applied to the stug III with frontal plates added and Pz IV schurtzen ;) endless possibilities ;P

also read in an earlier post that E-50 &amp; E-50M could be united in one vehicle is that solid information and if so i jope for good compensation for E-50 owners ;) if it gets replaced by a more unique and equally capable Tier 9 med i am al for it now the only difference between E-50 and E-50M is the gun and the rear placed engine. also soft stats in terms of mobility are better.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Leopard Prototype B won’t come as a premium, but it’s possible it will come as a hull option for Leopard PTA</p>
<p>is this a feature they will implement for multiple vehicles within a tree or just for a few select ones that actually have the mutiple hulls developed. also nice option with this feature is too give this option to the ferdinand and allow the upgrade into the elefant which is as historical as you can get. this can also be applied to the stug III with frontal plates added and Pz IV schurtzen ;) endless possibilities ;P</p>
<p>also read in an earlier post that E-50 &amp; E-50M could be united in one vehicle is that solid information and if so i jope for good compensation for E-50 owners ;) if it gets replaced by a more unique and equally capable Tier 9 med i am al for it now the only difference between E-50 and E-50M is the gun and the rear placed engine. also soft stats in terms of mobility are better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoblinFive</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-22007</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GoblinFive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 05:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-22007</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T23 :(]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T23 :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-22002</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 04:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-22002</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s already Japanese voiceover, it&#039;s in the Japanese version of the game.

And the voice actually kinda sucks, he&#039;s even less emotive than the American guy.  I&#039;m fluent in both so I can understand what he says.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s already Japanese voiceover, it&#8217;s in the Japanese version of the game.</p>
<p>And the voice actually kinda sucks, he&#8217;s even less emotive than the American guy.  I&#8217;m fluent in both so I can understand what he says.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-21953</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 23:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-21953</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;ve already said that the Sheridan won&#039;t be in WoT, the gun disqualifies it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;ve already said that the Sheridan won&#8217;t be in WoT, the gun disqualifies it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-21952</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 23:03:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-21952</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It can&#039;t be tier 6, everyone already has a Hellcat.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can&#8217;t be tier 6, everyone already has a Hellcat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/15/15-8-2013/#comment-21858</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Aug 2013 18:38:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1722#comment-21858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Prove it. :P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Prove it. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
