<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8.8 &#8211; Superpershing changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hillboy21</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-42919</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hillboy21]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Sep 2013 11:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-42919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[actually it still has 2x spaced armor, but the second armor`s angle has been changed (which is...a nerf itself). now even the 8,8 cm KwK 43 L/71 can penetrate its frontal armor]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>actually it still has 2x spaced armor, but the second armor`s angle has been changed (which is&#8230;a nerf itself). now even the 8,8 cm KwK 43 L/71 can penetrate its frontal armor</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The_Builder</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-27101</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The_Builder]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2013 13:24:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-27101</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[and once you turn your turret sideways you expose a gigantic weakspot, because the side parts of the spaced turret armor doesnt cover most of the lower turret area and such from that angle, making you a splendid target. 

The Super Pershing is a lost case, it just does not work as intended, never did, wont ever again either...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and once you turn your turret sideways you expose a gigantic weakspot, because the side parts of the spaced turret armor doesnt cover most of the lower turret area and such from that angle, making you a splendid target. </p>
<p>The Super Pershing is a lost case, it just does not work as intended, never did, wont ever again either&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RD</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-26933</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Aug 2013 09:05:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-26933</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Umm... The extra weight is like 60KG, or about 132 pounds, less than a cammo net. Not really anything to even worry about...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Umm&#8230; The extra weight is like 60KG, or about 132 pounds, less than a cammo net. Not really anything to even worry about&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rognik</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-26264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rognik]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 06:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-26264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The weight is not directly calculated in-game; it would be kind of silly if every single component inside the tank had to be modeled just so the game could add up all the weight. In reality the weight is just a number assigned to the tank by Wargaming based on their research.

Based on this I&#039;d say that they determined that the Super Pershing&#039;s weight number was a bit lower than in reality and so they decided to bump it up a bit to what it should have been. 60 kg doesn&#039;t really matter anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The weight is not directly calculated in-game; it would be kind of silly if every single component inside the tank had to be modeled just so the game could add up all the weight. In reality the weight is just a number assigned to the tank by Wargaming based on their research.</p>
<p>Based on this I&#8217;d say that they determined that the Super Pershing&#8217;s weight number was a bit lower than in reality and so they decided to bump it up a bit to what it should have been. 60 kg doesn&#8217;t really matter anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-26235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Aug 2013 02:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-26235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Seems easier to pen SP in test server even with 75 L70 at 300m distance. Maybe just luck?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems easier to pen SP in test server even with 75 L70 at 300m distance. Maybe just luck?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTWEmperor</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-26196</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTWEmperor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 23:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-26196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL no pen buff?  Fuck that, I&#039;m selling it then.  Armor was the only thing going for it and it wasn&#039;t THAT great to begin with if someone knew where to shoot.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL no pen buff?  Fuck that, I&#8217;m selling it then.  Armor was the only thing going for it and it wasn&#8217;t THAT great to begin with if someone knew where to shoot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m4dm4n</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-26181</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[m4dm4n]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-26181</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Steel Wall and Spartan easily achieved. Don&#039;t be afraid, there really is no nerf.
I let JadgTig8.8 to shoot at me.

http://www.pohrani.com/f/n/V0/2uBFjVIh/sp.png]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steel Wall and Spartan easily achieved. Don&#8217;t be afraid, there really is no nerf.<br />
I let JadgTig8.8 to shoot at me.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pohrani.com/f/n/V0/2uBFjVIh/sp.png" rel="nofollow">http://www.pohrani.com/f/n/V0/2uBFjVIh/sp.png</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-26180</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 21:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-26180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Welp this turd is dead

I guess people should be happy that WG let them have a one time gold refund]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Welp this turd is dead</p>
<p>I guess people should be happy that WG let them have a one time gold refund</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shape</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-26148</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[shape]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 20:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-26148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except that tank is a T26E1, which is what they modeled the tank in game after, yet they claim it&#039;s a T26E4, vastly different looking (no giant gun springs etc, they fixed that in the E4)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that tank is a T26E1, which is what they modeled the tank in game after, yet they claim it&#8217;s a T26E4, vastly different looking (no giant gun springs etc, they fixed that in the E4)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/23/8-8-superpershing-changes/#comment-26079</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Aug 2013 17:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2082#comment-26079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah but you can&#039;t deny that he has a point about  the SU-122-44, which I have myself.  I ROUTINELY kill tier IXs with it, including Heavies (though I don&#039;t usually go for the Heavies, instead letting my higher-tiered teammates hit them while I pick off the Mediums and Tank Destroyers), and that&#039;s mostly because what your AP won&#039;t pen, your HE usually will still do sizable damage to, and you can still pen the sides of pretty much anything at tier IX (though Soviet tanks like the IS-8 have proven an annoyance due to their low profile).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah but you can&#8217;t deny that he has a point about  the SU-122-44, which I have myself.  I ROUTINELY kill tier IXs with it, including Heavies (though I don&#8217;t usually go for the Heavies, instead letting my higher-tiered teammates hit them while I pick off the Mediums and Tank Destroyers), and that&#8217;s mostly because what your AP won&#8217;t pen, your HE usually will still do sizable damage to, and you can still pen the sides of pretty much anything at tier IX (though Soviet tanks like the IS-8 have proven an annoyance due to their low profile).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
