<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 26.8.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: www.brzikrediti.info</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-72458</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[www.brzikrediti.info]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2013 19:57:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-72458</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#959;u&amp;X68;&#1091;&amp;X62; f&amp;X70;c&amp;X65;&#1077; g&#954;k&#098; &amp;X71;&#1077;z&amp;X64; &#101;&amp;X6e;owg.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&omicron;u&amp;X68;&#1091;&amp;X62; f&amp;X70;c&amp;X65;&#1077; g&kappa;k&#098; &amp;X71;&#1077;z&amp;X64; &#101;&amp;X6e;owg.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-44041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Sep 2013 18:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-44041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you have source/actual proof for this?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have source/actual proof for this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryukra</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-30384</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryukra]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:12:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-30384</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you show your lowerplate it will be a firebox, if not you make other tanks fireboxes :) they play a bit different after the patch, but i believe its a netbuff.. they are now heavier, except for the e75, but its traverse buff is pretty nice, because good players will do better in the tank because of that :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you show your lowerplate it will be a firebox, if not you make other tanks fireboxes :) they play a bit different after the patch, but i believe its a netbuff.. they are now heavier, except for the e75, but its traverse buff is pretty nice, because good players will do better in the tank because of that :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OPFOR6</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-29437</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[OPFOR6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:52:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-29437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The HP damage system is what the problem is, where hits that penetrate and do not kill or disable the tank.  In most cases if a tank was penetrated by a 50mm or larger shell it caused enough damage to kill crew or damage the vehicle enough to render it out of action (either by defect, crew bailing or retreating due to damage).  There is not much space in a tank that does not have something vital located in it.  The HP damage system is strictly there to add to the fun factor.  Imagine if your tank is tracked you and have to use the real amount of time to repair it or if a hit jammed your turret or the crew bailed out after taking a penetrating hit to the engine.  Not much fun.

As for the cupola, the commander&#039;s head is normally located up in that area so he can see to fight the tank.  So besides the obvious dead commander problem ANY hit that pens there will cause pieces of metal to fly around inside the tank damaging things internally...Depending on the angle of the hit and the type of round, the penetrator could go into the crew compartment of pass through the turret into the engine or ammo.  I have seen  photos of tanks that had their cupolas blown off usually with significant damage to other parts of the tank because of the hit.  Should it do as much damage as a hit to the LFP?  Probably not but it is the HP damage model that causes that, a pen is a pen if the area is modeled.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The HP damage system is what the problem is, where hits that penetrate and do not kill or disable the tank.  In most cases if a tank was penetrated by a 50mm or larger shell it caused enough damage to kill crew or damage the vehicle enough to render it out of action (either by defect, crew bailing or retreating due to damage).  There is not much space in a tank that does not have something vital located in it.  The HP damage system is strictly there to add to the fun factor.  Imagine if your tank is tracked you and have to use the real amount of time to repair it or if a hit jammed your turret or the crew bailed out after taking a penetrating hit to the engine.  Not much fun.</p>
<p>As for the cupola, the commander&#8217;s head is normally located up in that area so he can see to fight the tank.  So besides the obvious dead commander problem ANY hit that pens there will cause pieces of metal to fly around inside the tank damaging things internally&#8230;Depending on the angle of the hit and the type of round, the penetrator could go into the crew compartment of pass through the turret into the engine or ammo.  I have seen  photos of tanks that had their cupolas blown off usually with significant damage to other parts of the tank because of the hit.  Should it do as much damage as a hit to the LFP?  Probably not but it is the HP damage model that causes that, a pen is a pen if the area is modeled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-28831</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2013 03:30:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-28831</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On another note, on the testserver the Tier Tens - E-50M, E-100, JE-100 - *still* retain their ~Ahnenerbe*Magic~ bullshit engines. (No idea about the Maus one, given that thing&#039;s weird power system.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On another note, on the testserver the Tier Tens &#8211; E-50M, E-100, JE-100 &#8211; *still* retain their ~Ahnenerbe*Magic~ bullshit engines. (No idea about the Maus one, given that thing&#8217;s weird power system.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedShocktrooper</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-28662</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RedShocktrooper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 18:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-28662</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Overlord&#039;s Q/A is generally in english on his blog, overlord-wot.blogspot.com

The above Q/A is from SerB, translated from Russian.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Overlord&#8217;s Q/A is generally in english on his blog, overlord-wot.blogspot.com</p>
<p>The above Q/A is from SerB, translated from Russian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Septfox Malkier</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-28589</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Septfox Malkier]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:49:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-28589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It strikes me as odd to argue &quot;fairness&quot; when referring to a number that doesn&#039;t actually *do* anything. Having 50% doesn&#039;t give you an advantage over anyone, having 49% doesn&#039;t give you any sort of disadvantage either. It is literally neither fair nor unfair.

Also, as you pointed out, you were taking advantage of the system, using rounding to make it seem like you had 50% on those tanks, when you really didn&#039;t...effectively, lying to anyone who looked at your service record. How is that more right than WG fixing their system so it rounds like it should have to begin with?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It strikes me as odd to argue &#8220;fairness&#8221; when referring to a number that doesn&#8217;t actually *do* anything. Having 50% doesn&#8217;t give you an advantage over anyone, having 49% doesn&#8217;t give you any sort of disadvantage either. It is literally neither fair nor unfair.</p>
<p>Also, as you pointed out, you were taking advantage of the system, using rounding to make it seem like you had 50% on those tanks, when you really didn&#8217;t&#8230;effectively, lying to anyone who looked at your service record. How is that more right than WG fixing their system so it rounds like it should have to begin with?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-28567</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-28567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Actually they were wrong, composite armour gave new life to armour like all tanks after T-64 showed.&quot;

Composite armour wasn&#039;t on the table when the Leo and AMX-30 were designed. Plus the 105mm&#039;s seemed to do quite a number on mid-Cold War tanks *anyway*, judging by the Israeli experience.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Actually they were wrong, composite armour gave new life to armour like all tanks after T-64 showed.&#8221;</p>
<p>Composite armour wasn&#8217;t on the table when the Leo and AMX-30 were designed. Plus the 105mm&#8217;s seemed to do quite a number on mid-Cold War tanks *anyway*, judging by the Israeli experience.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-28558</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-28558</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bronze Age, different reigning economic principles too if memory serves. Got anything newer?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bronze Age, different reigning economic principles too if memory serves. Got anything newer?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/26/26-8-2013/#comment-28556</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2230#comment-28556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Save for the -100 the E-series is pure &quot;paper projects&quot; anyway and the topic never came up so I didn&#039;t bother, but as a matter of fact their fantastical (in both senses of the word) performance specs have long kind of annoyed me. Especially given how well the HL 295 *actually* worked in comparision.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Save for the -100 the E-series is pure &#8220;paper projects&#8221; anyway and the topic never came up so I didn&#8217;t bother, but as a matter of fact their fantastical (in both senses of the word) performance specs have long kind of annoyed me. Especially given how well the HL 295 *actually* worked in comparision.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
