Comments on: T-34-3 and 112 now available on 8.8 test server

By: Anonym

Anonym — Sun, 01 Sep 2013 18:06:15 +0000

Best tank ever! LoL

By: nikosgreece

nikosgreece — Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:57:41 +0000

guys the T34-3 is very nice tank bat the problem is on his gun i have the TYPE 59 and i think is 10times beter!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :)

By: TankaTed

TankaTed — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 22:02:24 +0000

Who are you, Draconis76? WG fanboy.

By: Bazinga

Bazinga — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:40:43 +0000

did u play it on PTR? i dont think so, its not that bad… ^^ in fact it can be a very good tank, got 4 kills in my first battle with it and i am not a good medium tank player since i prefer heavy tanks and td’s. but doing some hit-and-run attacks and flanking distracted enemies is very funny whit it because of its high dmg per shot ^^

By: Bazinga

Bazinga — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 17:33:21 +0000

>>“how can’t you pen those bastards”. I just penned the 112 every single time with no premium ammo used. The lower front plate is so easy to hit, and you can NEVER bounce there.<<

Absolutly true, i penentrated 112 with 3 out of 5 shots in the front because of its extremly weak LFP. The UFP is great, bounced even Ferdi shots several times but u can knock out 112 with T-34-3 very easy hitting its LFP and/or sides. They are both good tanks imho but T-34-3 is difficult to play, its more hit-and-run tactics tank in close combat range but very hard to do some good dmg at bigger distances.
Btw. dont judge T-34-3 armor after a few testserver battles, it actually CAN bounce some heavy rounds even from Jagdtiger (received 3 of them with only 1 penetrating^^) but those gold spamming bastards on PTR ruin serious testing…

By: FrankyK

FrankyK — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 16:37:14 +0000

The 112 seems to be far better than the IS-6.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:59:53 +0000

The T34-3 seems to be more popular on the testserver. It definitly plays better than the 112. Because of the low front plate armor and the non-existent side armor it feels like a slow medium.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:58:49 +0000

The 112 has virtually no lower front plate armor. I was 100% sure i would buy it, but after testing it.

The lower front plate has 80 armor and is easy to it. It has an effective armor of 133,…

So it can be easily penetrated buy any tank it faces, even light tanks. The lower front plate is pretty big too. I think it should be buffed to 110 atleast. Cause with this lower front plate you can’T brawl in the city at all, which you could do very easily with the IS-6.

The Is-6 seems to be better in every way. He has a side armor of 130 (100+30), and his lower frontplate is 120, which is 33,3% higher. Sides of the turret and reload time are also much higher than the 112′s.

The IS-6 is faster too, oh jeez.
After all the hype for the 112, it seems like a really shitty version of an IS-6 (too bad, cause i don’t play sovjets)

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:31:39 +0000

T-34-3 need (depression) buff.
from value: -3
to value: -4 or -5

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 27 Aug 2013 15:27:46 +0000

Sorry for my English.
I mean appearance of the tank.
T-34-3 is beautiful.
But worst medium tank in this game… :-(