<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8.8 Tiger II Armor Changes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-33433</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Sep 2013 08:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-33433</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Facehugging king of tier 8?

It&#039;ll get penetrated everywhere, turret front, upper glacis, lower glacis, the sides etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Facehugging king of tier 8?</p>
<p>It&#8217;ll get penetrated everywhere, turret front, upper glacis, lower glacis, the sides etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Torx</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30495</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Torx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 06:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30495</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wasn&#039;t there an article about whether the machine-gun ports were actually weakspots? afaik they weren&#039;t weak at all when compared with the hull. But I can&#039;t seem to find it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there an article about whether the machine-gun ports were actually weakspots? afaik they weren&#8217;t weak at all when compared with the hull. But I can&#8217;t seem to find it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landsraad(NA)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30421</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landsraad(NA)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 22:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30421</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay, I know people are upset about the whole LFP decrease, but I gotta be honest here: Any KT driver who can&#039;t set up with a mostly covered or angled LFP in combat is doing it wrong.  You get behind a low rise or bump or something, and if that doesn&#039;t work just angle your hull about 30 degrees for better protection. Besides, it&#039;s not all bad. The Cupola weak spot is all but gone, the MG weak point is gone, and, I don&#039;t know if anyone else noticed, but the upper glacis even got a buff from 140 to 150.  Add that to the driving changes, and all the pluses and minuses either cancel or edge out slightly in favor of positive.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, I know people are upset about the whole LFP decrease, but I gotta be honest here: Any KT driver who can&#8217;t set up with a mostly covered or angled LFP in combat is doing it wrong.  You get behind a low rise or bump or something, and if that doesn&#8217;t work just angle your hull about 30 degrees for better protection. Besides, it&#8217;s not all bad. The Cupola weak spot is all but gone, the MG weak point is gone, and, I don&#8217;t know if anyone else noticed, but the upper glacis even got a buff from 140 to 150.  Add that to the driving changes, and all the pluses and minuses either cancel or edge out slightly in favor of positive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Perfect</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30390</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Perfect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 21:19:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The purple spaced armor is thinner.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purple spaced armor is thinner.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTWEmperor</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30366</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MTWEmperor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 20:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30366</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m sorry but what?  200 pen guns used to go right through.  Not so anymore because of the normalization buff.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but what?  200 pen guns used to go right through.  Not so anymore because of the normalization buff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BauBau (NA)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30308</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[BauBau (NA)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 19:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks like both t9 JT and t8 JT88 get their frontal changed aswell. By changed I mean the UFP is slightly more angled (I determined that through visual comparison of screenshots taken on both servers). So if UFP is changed it&#039;s safe to assume LFP armor was reduced to 100mm and the machine-gun weak-spot removed. Afterall JT88, JT and Tiger 2 share the same hull so change to 1 of them should happen to all of them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like both t9 JT and t8 JT88 get their frontal changed aswell. By changed I mean the UFP is slightly more angled (I determined that through visual comparison of screenshots taken on both servers). So if UFP is changed it&#8217;s safe to assume LFP armor was reduced to 100mm and the machine-gun weak-spot removed. Afterall JT88, JT and Tiger 2 share the same hull so change to 1 of them should happen to all of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: anon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30300</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So we have new facehugging king of tier 8. 
Also - LFP was easy thing anyway, now, with buffed depression you can at least hide it easily so I think that as long as you don&#039;t lose your mind and charge like an idiots it&#039;ll be fine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So we have new facehugging king of tier 8.<br />
Also &#8211; LFP was easy thing anyway, now, with buffed depression you can at least hide it easily so I think that as long as you don&#8217;t lose your mind and charge like an idiots it&#8217;ll be fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30282</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 18:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All that Ahnenerbe mumbo-jumbo is obviously good for *something*. :p]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All that Ahnenerbe mumbo-jumbo is obviously good for *something*. :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30266</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30266</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MG ball isn&#039;t a weakspot but people will keep shooting there for eras before they notice that the model has been changed, depression has been buffed to 8 degrees which will give you little-to-no problems in hiding the LFP, terrain resistance has been buffed and the guns remained the same lethal ones, this tank is OP.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MG ball isn&#8217;t a weakspot but people will keep shooting there for eras before they notice that the model has been changed, depression has been buffed to 8 degrees which will give you little-to-no problems in hiding the LFP, terrain resistance has been buffed and the guns remained the same lethal ones, this tank is OP.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/8-8-tiger-ii-armor-changes/#comment-30260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Aug 2013 17:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2383#comment-30260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How is it possible that the MG port isn&#039;t a weak spot on this ugly tank? Nazi-science?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is it possible that the MG port isn&#8217;t a weak spot on this ugly tank? Nazi-science?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
