<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: M48 Errata</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pancake08</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-35796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pancake08]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Sep 2013 13:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-35796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i agree with you, the m48 was nerfed to oblivion. even his predecessor the m46 is much better as this cancer ? if i want to move up to reloacte it takes hours to move. what gives me the mobility if I do not come from the place?
thats not a lie that more and more russians are in the matches. and why? because every tank will be nerfed. so if u want that, so take out the over nations from the game. i wait for the announced &quot;rebalance&quot; of the us techtree. we know what u mean with rebalance... its totally the same as nerf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with you, the m48 was nerfed to oblivion. even his predecessor the m46 is much better as this cancer ? if i want to move up to reloacte it takes hours to move. what gives me the mobility if I do not come from the place?<br />
thats not a lie that more and more russians are in the matches. and why? because every tank will be nerfed. so if u want that, so take out the over nations from the game. i wait for the announced &#8220;rebalance&#8221; of the us techtree. we know what u mean with rebalance&#8230; its totally the same as nerf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 21:02:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s, since nobody suspected it to be a bug. The tank is the worst tier 10 already. It needs desperately some buffs.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s, since nobody suspected it to be a bug. The tank is the worst tier 10 already. It needs desperately some buffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winger</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30806</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 15:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Except that the t62A has much more dpm. And Viewrange is hardly a bonus because the crappy cammorating compensates negatively.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Except that the t62A has much more dpm. And Viewrange is hardly a bonus because the crappy cammorating compensates negatively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Xel M</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Xel M]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The difference in 10-20 meters view range doesn&#039;t make up the significant draw backs it has. The spread in viewranges should be far greater at top tiers. Perhaps if a tank isn&#039;t a light tank or have special optics/commander turret then Camo and view range should be inverse relationships.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference in 10-20 meters view range doesn&#8217;t make up the significant draw backs it has. The spread in viewranges should be far greater at top tiers. Perhaps if a tank isn&#8217;t a light tank or have special optics/commander turret then Camo and view range should be inverse relationships.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hellfish</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hellfish]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 13:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are you shooting at?
The SU-100M1 has the same 175 many other tier 7 tanks get. Ok, it&#039;s a TD but you get compensated with an awesome rate of fire. I like it. Tiers 8-10 get good penetration (219/258/290), capable of penetrating anything they face frontaly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you shooting at?<br />
The SU-100M1 has the same 175 many other tier 7 tanks get. Ok, it&#8217;s a TD but you get compensated with an awesome rate of fire. I like it. Tiers 8-10 get good penetration (219/258/290), capable of penetrating anything they face frontaly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aesir</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30678</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aesir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 12:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30678</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The version we have in game is the M48A1E1. It is actually historical, but at the same time kind of redundant when the M60E1 (M60 with first A1-type turret)  which was in the testing phase around the same time in 1960.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The version we have in game is the M48A1E1. It is actually historical, but at the same time kind of redundant when the M60E1 (M60 with first A1-type turret)  which was in the testing phase around the same time in 1960.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: exNoob</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30593</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[exNoob]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks,
Bias russians!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks,<br />
Bias russians!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ViktorKitov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30592</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ViktorKitov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I wonder what kind of play style do you adop when you face tanks that you cant penetrate in any way from the front?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder what kind of play style do you adop when you face tanks that you cant penetrate in any way from the front?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ViktorKitov</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30587</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ViktorKitov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[111!!!!!!!!1111!!!!!11!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>111!!!!!!!!1111!!!!!11!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: karn</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/29/m48-errata/#comment-30584</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[karn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 08:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=2429#comment-30584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The mobility of the t 55 is historic as per the game  the 700 hp engine is an XP sink nothing more . And the 120 mm  armour is from the 1st  production t54 . And I am grinding the US medium line it is so much better than the soviet line until tier 9 where they reach parity .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The mobility of the t 55 is historic as per the game  the 700 hp engine is an XP sink nothing more . And the 120 mm  armour is from the 1st  production t54 . And I am grinding the US medium line it is so much better than the soviet line until tier 9 where they reach parity .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
