Comments on: 8.8 patchnotes – official tank changes

By: yarak hasan

yarak hasan — Wed, 11 Sep 2013 20:58:24 +0000

It is obvious the game managed by lamers that the answer.

By: yarak hasan

yarak hasan — Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:38:17 +0000

End is near. We gonna throw all of our hard work to trash.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:09:18 +0000

About fucking time the 100mm stopped losing to the 88′s and 90mm’s in damage, that was just silly.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:06:38 +0000

Also IIRC the testserver, the A-43 basically doesn’t *have* factually viable setups other than the 76mm which might of be relevant.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:04:14 +0000

As long as you’re not in my team, sure.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:03:09 +0000

Do I *really* have to remind you that in the equation mass is in the first power and velocity in the second…?

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 20:01:22 +0000

Take any old bolt-action infantry rifle and that sucker can, ballistically, hit a man like two kilometers away.
Three guesses how much relevance that has to PRACTICAL accuracy, nevermind now in combat conditions? Same thing.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 19:58:34 +0000

Firing trials =/= combat conditions. Duh.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:00:21 +0000

Did anybody notice that not only the price for the 5cm KwK 39 L/60 has changed?
http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/834/8m59.png/
They just shifted that gun up one Tier (is Tier 3 in 0.8.7 and will be Tier 4 in 0.8.8) just because
it’s used on that new Durchbruchswagen2 Tier4 heavy tank.
So what we get is in fact a Tier4 HT with a Tier3 gun that has been faked to Tier4 (stats are the same…),
pretty lame if you ask me……

By: Vlevs

Vlevs — Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:53:08 +0000

That is, if you don’t count the Terrible Duo of German heavies. And as for glacis thickness – I don’t believe you. Contact me ingame if you want proof, I’ll bring my IS-4 for test firing.