<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On WT E-100 once again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iron_Tsunami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron_Tsunami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 02:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ROFL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ROFL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2013 01:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to mention enough fuel to keep them flying]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention enough fuel to keep them flying</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39590</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:59:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The US was a bit doctrinally stuck on the .50 BMG for its aircraft guns for variety of reasons, and only followed the general practice of changing over to autocannon relatively late. Granted such would have been a mite bulky for bomber self-defense anyway, but then again it also turned out making the plane really fast instead was such an excellent defense onboard armament was a moot point.

That said, AFAIK Luftwaffe pilots did NOT like attacking the bomber &quot;combat boxes&quot; and the Germans went to quite some lenght and ingenuity in trying to devise ways to shoot the damn things down from standoff distances instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The US was a bit doctrinally stuck on the .50 BMG for its aircraft guns for variety of reasons, and only followed the general practice of changing over to autocannon relatively late. Granted such would have been a mite bulky for bomber self-defense anyway, but then again it also turned out making the plane really fast instead was such an excellent defense onboard armament was a moot point.</p>
<p>That said, AFAIK Luftwaffe pilots did NOT like attacking the bomber &#8220;combat boxes&#8221; and the Germans went to quite some lenght and ingenuity in trying to devise ways to shoot the damn things down from standoff distances instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39585</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Ramirez! Take one for the team!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Ramirez! Take one for the team!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39581</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cannot unsee!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cannot unsee!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39580</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39580</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually it was a remark made by a newspaper reporter upon seeing all the machine guns on the original prototype, which Boeing then trademarked as the official name.  That being said, those machine guns weren&#039;t quite as effective in practice as they seemed to be in theory.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually it was a remark made by a newspaper reporter upon seeing all the machine guns on the original prototype, which Boeing then trademarked as the official name.  That being said, those machine guns weren&#8217;t quite as effective in practice as they seemed to be in theory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nah the TOG II* is already known as the &quot;Compensator&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah the TOG II* is already known as the &#8220;Compensator&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39577</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Enemy Tactical Nuke incoming!  It&#039;s over!&quot;

*Everyone starts TKing each other*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Enemy Tactical Nuke incoming!  It&#8217;s over!&#8221;</p>
<p>*Everyone starts TKing each other*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39575</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 19:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I myself prefer &quot;Waffletraktor&quot; E-100, but that&#039;s just me (they call the Leichtraktor the &quot;Loltraktor&quot;, so I&#039;m keeping it consistent here).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I myself prefer &#8220;Waffletraktor&#8221; E-100, but that&#8217;s just me (they call the Leichtraktor the &#8220;Loltraktor&#8221;, so I&#8217;m keeping it consistent here).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/11/on-wt-e-100-once-again/#comment-39542</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Sep 2013 18:19:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3034#comment-39542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...are you STILL clueless about what was the point of the copypasta composite?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;are you STILL clueless about what was the point of the copypasta composite?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
