Comments on: 12.9.2013 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/ Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2 By: H http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-51505 Mon, 30 Sep 2013 08:32:53 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-51505 Hi, SS.
Could you please provied the url where you got this from:
“- apparently (and possibly newly in 8.8), there is a new feature. If two tanks fire at each other and (theoretically) destroy each other with one shot, only one will die, the one, who (according to the server) fired faster. In other words, when a tank dies, its fired shell apparently disappears”
Is it this one? http://wot-news.com/index.php/track/post/ru/kokerus/1377793877

]]> By: word of tanks hack http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-41642 Sat, 14 Sep 2013 06:12:07 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-41642 Hi there! This blog post couldn’t be written any better!

Looking at this article reminds me of my previous roommate!
He constantly kept preaching about this. I’ll send
this article to him. Fairly certain he’ll have a very good read.
I appreciate you for sharing!

]]> By: blizzard36 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-41365 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:09:14 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-41365 I’m thinking that he meant that a shell fired by someone who should have already been dead, but got a shell off due to lag, will be removed. Rather than the first shell to target canceling out the second one.

At least I hope so, because that would be a heck of a nerf to low velocity shells. Perhaps an RU server reader can ask for clarification?

]]> By: Kellomies http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-41123 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:56:51 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-41123 Stop failing and learn to play.

]]> By: SzalonyChemik http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-41115 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 12:51:12 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-41115 “apparently (and possibly newly in 8.8), there is a new feature. If two tanks fire at each other and (theoretically) destroy each other with one shot, only one will die, the one, who (according to the server) fired faster. In other words, when a tank dies, its fired shell apparently disappears”
STUPID

]]> By: llVIU[F_O_S] http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-40997 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:25:10 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-40997 “was nerfed accordingly” how about you “accordingly” put the 1940s tanks to NOT fight 1960s tanks?

double standard

]]> By: Flakmeister http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-40967 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 09:59:32 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-40967 SerB said about Leo 1A6, not 1A3,
1A6 has Leopard 2 gun so it can defeat T-72 no problem

]]> By: Zarax http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-40843 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:42:45 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-40843 I can confirm that, 3.7″ is pretty great at it.

]]> By: Zarax http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-40839 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:38:56 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-40839 That’s it, unless you want to use an uber stretched WT Panther II.

]]> By: Zarax http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/12/12-10-2013/#comment-40835 Fri, 13 Sep 2013 08:36:45 +0000 http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3093#comment-40835 Unless there’s something more detailed than Panzer tracts 20-1 Spielberger still has better information on most E-series barring E-100.

]]>