Comments on: “A SU-100 that shot an American ship”

By: WGA_nyancat_SK

WGA_nyancat_SK — Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:09:55 +0000

retarded comment

By: AirWolf230

AirWolf230 — Sat, 14 Sep 2013 23:55:26 +0000

There’s a story or a croatian tank damaging a serbian ship on the shores of dubrovnik + ther a small documentary coratian only for you guys so just watch it
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=niJqhQIF4v0
+ thers a Croatian M10 tank firing

By: T3azz (banned)

T3azz (banned) — Sat, 14 Sep 2013 14:44:13 +0000

Stfu, understand that people dont like US military and will/have shoot them down. I guess some day you will probably deny that twin towers got attacked as well?

By: Cpt_Jarem

Cpt_Jarem — Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:06:44 +0000

>Perrrrrinu~
Stop, he hates that ;D

By: Rich Vail

Rich Vail — Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:39:02 +0000

pro free market comment.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:24:57 +0000

That sounds pretty awesome actually.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:16:07 +0000

You seem to have some rather curious ideas regarding the resisliency of a damn *freighter*… given that actual destroyers were for all practical intents and purposes entirely unarmoured (whence the nickname “tin cans”) to the point that back in WW2 LVT(A) “amtank” commanders quite seriously considered their units’ massed 75mm howitzers capable of chasing off a Japanese destroyer should they run into one.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:52:43 +0000

If he DID shoot at it, it probably just bounced off the hull, assuming he hit it at all.

By: Torenico

Torenico — Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:40:20 +0000

I heard SU-100s are still in service in the Vietnamese Army?. Like Stuarts still in service in Paraguay.

By: Energycore

Energycore — Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:16:54 +0000

This is historical and i demand that WG gives the SU-100 the 450mm pen it deserves.