Comments on: WG fail, Japanese edition

By: Mesmerize

Mesmerize — Fri, 20 Sep 2013 11:57:10 +0000

dat quasar noob again

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 20 Sep 2013 07:28:51 +0000

I second to this. There’s also the problem that they pay and if i show some initiative they may stop paying me and hire someone else. Well, at least they won’t send employees to gulags…

By: Ostensibly

Ostensibly — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:50:41 +0000

Just Woras being a self-entitled tool.

By: LekkerBezig

LekkerBezig — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 22:40:27 +0000

well, a 6 is pretty damn near close to a 7 on a keyboard….. stop making fools out of these gentle peeps who are sort of condemned to the Minsk WG slavery…………

By: stefanpsi

stefanpsi — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 19:00:07 +0000

:)))))))
LOL

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:56:13 +0000

That’s not a small typo. Also it comes from a company that boasts “historical accuracy” (in an arcade game used only when it suits them…) all over the place, so the factual errors should be highlighted.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 17:55:05 +0000

You know what SS, I think that the problem lies not (only) in people hired. WG is a typical Soviet-minded organization. There is no place for lower rank employees feedback (not to mention users…). The thing is that I’m sure that someone noticed it, either here, or in Japan, but the order is to publish any shit that comes out of Minsk, so if it is official, and I’m emplyed by an organization that does not appreciate initiative, I’ll just shrug and not react. That’s the problem with WG, stupid organizational scheme, people with no balls, often with no imagination, and, well, as it is so common in the EU office – no love for tanks.

By: ChielScape

ChielScape — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:49:01 +0000

The Type 64 does exist. It’s just not a tank.
It’s a 7.62x51mm NATO battle rifle. That said, it doesn’t use NATO but specific Japanese made ammo with lower propellant charge to reduce recoil for the small Japanese men.

By: ChielScape

ChielScape — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:47:18 +0000

The mistake is intentional. It’s a reference.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Thu, 19 Sep 2013 16:29:40 +0000

They still had a shitload of the little buggers sitting around in “war reserve” when Round Two came around, too. Apparently issued quite a few to new units too – I’m sure the confidence was high. :P