<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Premium EU tank destroyers &#8211; Part I</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landsraad(NA)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-48509</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landsraad(NA)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2013 01:51:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-48509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So not only would it be very similar to the Hetzer, it&#039;s got pretty much the same name as the ST-I (that &quot;I&quot; being a Roman numeral &quot;1&quot;). Ah yes, good work Wargaming, keep putting in more tanks with names that confuse the hell out of people. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So not only would it be very similar to the Hetzer, it&#8217;s got pretty much the same name as the ST-I (that &#8220;I&#8221; being a Roman numeral &#8220;1&#8243;). Ah yes, good work Wargaming, keep putting in more tanks with names that confuse the hell out of people. :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Premium EU tank destroyers &#8211; part III &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-48447</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Premium EU tank destroyers &#8211; part III &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 22:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-48447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 1: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/ Part 2: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 1: <a href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/" rel="nofollow">http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/</a> Part 2: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sl8</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-48084</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sl8]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 09:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-48084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Still hoping for that Romanian TD branch, but tier 2 -&gt; ~5 is not really a big branch. Can&#039;t understand how they would implement them if they don&#039;t want the national branches to mix. Maybe just a sidebranch ? They can&#039;t make them all premium.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still hoping for that Romanian TD branch, but tier 2 -&gt; ~5 is not really a big branch. Can&#8217;t understand how they would implement them if they don&#8217;t want the national branches to mix. Maybe just a sidebranch ? They can&#8217;t make them all premium.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-47961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-47961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SS is not the biggest tank geek around here... There are a few others who silently stalk this blog... *cough*
.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SS is not the biggest tank geek around here&#8230; There are a few others who silently stalk this blog&#8230; *cough*<br />
.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-47959</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2013 02:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-47959</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Indeed it will be.  The har part with the EU tree will be what to include and what tier to put it on as there are many, many, many, many options before you even get to paper tanks or even protos.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed it will be.  The har part with the EU tree will be what to include and what tier to put it on as there are many, many, many, many options before you even get to paper tanks or even protos.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sp15</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-47838</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sp15]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-47838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i have actually been working on how a swiss branch
here is what i have thus far

light/medium line (some vehicles here were concidered TDs i belive)

FT-17&gt;R35&gt;Pzw.39&gt;Scorpion 57mm&gt;Scorpion 90mm&gt;Pirate 90mm&gt;HS30 90mm&gt;KW30&gt;Pz.58&gt;Pz.61

ive also been experimenting with a TD line which would start at tier 4 from the Pzw.39

G13&gt;Nahkampfkanone I&gt;Nahkampfkanone II&gt;Mowag Gepard&gt;Mowag HM 3&gt;Mowag Taifun

note that this line is highly experimental and that the Mowag Taifun is outside the wot timeframe also the HM 3 is a Jagdpanzer kanone

i have written about some of these tanks here
http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/258940-european-tech-tree-part-2-possible-tanks/page__fromsearch__1]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have actually been working on how a swiss branch<br />
here is what i have thus far</p>
<p>light/medium line (some vehicles here were concidered TDs i belive)</p>
<p>FT-17&gt;R35&gt;Pzw.39&gt;Scorpion 57mm&gt;Scorpion 90mm&gt;Pirate 90mm&gt;HS30 90mm&gt;KW30&gt;Pz.58&gt;Pz.61</p>
<p>ive also been experimenting with a TD line which would start at tier 4 from the Pzw.39</p>
<p>G13&gt;Nahkampfkanone I&gt;Nahkampfkanone II&gt;Mowag Gepard&gt;Mowag HM 3&gt;Mowag Taifun</p>
<p>note that this line is highly experimental and that the Mowag Taifun is outside the wot timeframe also the HM 3 is a Jagdpanzer kanone</p>
<p>i have written about some of these tanks here<br />
<a href="http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/258940-european-tech-tree-part-2-possible-tanks/page__fromsearch__1" rel="nofollow">http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/258940-european-tech-tree-part-2-possible-tanks/page__fromsearch__1</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winter_Sun</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-47821</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winter_Sun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-47821</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree, considering most of the Yugoslavian TDs would be wonderful premium candidates.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, considering most of the Yugoslavian TDs would be wonderful premium candidates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolHandLuke</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-47818</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CoolHandLuke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-47818</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Perhaps a tier 10 Bat Chat style &quot;medium&quot; tank?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps a tier 10 Bat Chat style &#8220;medium&#8221; tank?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CoolHandLuke</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-47815</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CoolHandLuke]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 19:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-47815</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How would the Swiss branch look? I was under the impression that the Swiss mostly had higher tier medium candidates and not much else.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would the Swiss branch look? I was under the impression that the Swiss mostly had higher tier medium candidates and not much else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Silentstalker</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/23/possible-premium-eu-tank-destroyers-part-i/#comment-47808</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Silentstalker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2013 18:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3428#comment-47808</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, considering its armament... hard to say.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, considering its armament&#8230; hard to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
