<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: KV-4 design proposals</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: xCaptainObviousx</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49757</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xCaptainObviousx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49757</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well... looked at the armor again, safe to say that it would be t8, you can&#039;t have 130 mm armor all the way around at t7. THINK OF THE POOR SHERMANS!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230; looked at the armor again, safe to say that it would be t8, you can&#8217;t have 130 mm armor all the way around at t7. THINK OF THE POOR SHERMANS!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xCaptainObviousx</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49753</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[xCaptainObviousx]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 06:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would love to buy that 1st model as a t7 premium heavy. It looks like it would be on par with a semi-stock KV-3.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to buy that 1st model as a t7 premium heavy. It looks like it would be on par with a semi-stock KV-3.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49721</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Sep 2013 04:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49721</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s probably enough KV-4 variants to make their own tech tree XD.

But seriously, some of these could actually be placed in the game along with the KV-4 already in it, particularly the ones with hull-mounted 107 mm guns, possible in a future &quot;Heavy Tank Destroyer&quot; line (consisting of TDs that are closer to the German ones already in the game than traditional Soviet TDs, with heavy armor and powerful guns, but low speed and poor camo values).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s probably enough KV-4 variants to make their own tech tree XD.</p>
<p>But seriously, some of these could actually be placed in the game along with the KV-4 already in it, particularly the ones with hull-mounted 107 mm guns, possible in a future &#8220;Heavy Tank Destroyer&#8221; line (consisting of TDs that are closer to the German ones already in the game than traditional Soviet TDs, with heavy armor and powerful guns, but low speed and poor camo values).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49627</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 23:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49627</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t know if I would want to drive any of those versions.  However, let me say those sketchup tanks, and the layout of the diagrams look fantastic.  Very nicely done!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if I would want to drive any of those versions.  However, let me say those sketchup tanks, and the layout of the diagrams look fantastic.  Very nicely done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Iron_Tsunami</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49583</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Iron_Tsunami]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 22:01:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First and last are epic looking! :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First and last are epic looking! :D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Landsraad(NA)</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49565</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Landsraad(NA)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 21:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Oh man, the turret on Fedorenko’s proposal looks so hilariously cartoonish. I think even GamesWorkshop would be embarrassed to put that on a tank.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh man, the turret on Fedorenko’s proposal looks so hilariously cartoonish. I think even GamesWorkshop would be embarrassed to put that on a tank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49497</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oh nuts, wrong reply button... &gt;.&lt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh nuts, wrong reply button&#8230; &gt;.&lt;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49496</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:59:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Maus, I am your father.&quot;
&quot;NEEEEEEEEEEEEIN!&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Maus, I am your father.&#8221;<br />
&#8220;NEEEEEEEEEEEEIN!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bojan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:54:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[B-13 and S-70 were very much NOT the same gun. S-70 ammo was based on necked down 152mm Canet ammo, and had almost 50% more propellant than B-13 ammo. 

S-70 was ballistically similar to post war 130mm M46 field gun and 130mm SM-4 coastal gu, even if those used somewhat different ammo. B-13 had lower ballistics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>B-13 and S-70 were very much NOT the same gun. S-70 ammo was based on necked down 152mm Canet ammo, and had almost 50% more propellant than B-13 ammo. </p>
<p>S-70 was ballistically similar to post war 130mm M46 field gun and 130mm SM-4 coastal gu, even if those used somewhat different ammo. B-13 had lower ballistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/26/kv-4-design-proposals/#comment-49449</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Sep 2013 19:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=3521#comment-49449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What are you talking about, the USSR has tons of beautiful looking tanks. France and the u.s. on the other hand...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are you talking about, the USSR has tons of beautiful looking tanks. France and the u.s. on the other hand&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
