Comments on: Upcoming tanks in WoT 1 – T-4 and T-5

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 12 Oct 2013 16:26:17 +0000

+50% ammo detonation chance

gotta be fair to every Russian bias claim after all, because you know… they DO tend to suffer from lol worthy catastrophic ammunition explosion a lot in game.

By: Anony

Anony — Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:56:05 +0000

“The Soviets valued the comfort and quality optics and radios in the German tanks ”

This is why in-game the Soviet radios are so much better than the German ones, ha.

By: EcchiRevenge

EcchiRevenge — Thu, 10 Oct 2013 02:11:08 +0000

Soviet Star bestows blessing of great father Stalin to any tank.
+50% to armour effectiveness and chance to autobounce at weird angle.
+50% to enemy cry of “Russian Bias”
+10% chance for fire. :[

By: ClassicFrog

ClassicFrog — Thu, 10 Oct 2013 00:16:14 +0000

That reminds me of troll noob platoons where tier 1 drives around and shoot tier 10 allies. Then someone snaps and kills them. :D

By: An Angry Mob

An Angry Mob — Wed, 09 Oct 2013 23:31:53 +0000

Herp derp, once war was won, all cars/trucks/tanks/trains/donkeys that were on the russian front (and I’d like to point out that russian front included about half of germany) now belonged to them. This is including shit that still stood in the factory lots and in maintenance hangars and the like. So yeah, saying they captured so much shit thorough the war is correct.

But for a wehraboo anything from soviets are lies and propaganda, isn’t it?

By: damazz

damazz — Wed, 09 Oct 2013 22:47:32 +0000

koga briga za bugarski?

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 09 Oct 2013 21:39:42 +0000

Make it go three times faster if you paint the whole thing red.

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Wed, 09 Oct 2013 21:04:28 +0000

Why are you even bothering to try this silly game of pretension when you can’t mimick my Peerless Writing Style(tm)?

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Wed, 09 Oct 2013 21:03:30 +0000

Or, even more likely, someone somewhere down the line having forgotten to sort the AFVs from the other vehicles. After all the quoted “snapshot” of captures in late ’42 to early ’43 are both perfectly plausible numbers and diligently enough differentiated.

By: esa

esa — Wed, 09 Oct 2013 20:51:22 +0000

and twice as fast