<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 90 mm and the M4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-59498</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 19:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-59498</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you say the 122mm APBC dispersion is worse.
Compare the 90mm extreme dispersion blue box to the 122mm extreme dispersion outer circle here:
http://www.panzer-war.com/Images/XQ122.jpg

(Red box is standard 2.5m x 2.0m German target.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you say the 122mm APBC dispersion is worse.<br />
Compare the 90mm extreme dispersion blue box to the 122mm extreme dispersion outer circle here:<br />
<a href="http://www.panzer-war.com/Images/XQ122.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.panzer-war.com/Images/XQ122.jpg</a></p>
<p>(Red box is standard 2.5m x 2.0m German target.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drakko</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58715</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drakko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 04:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58715</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not to mention ERA(explosive reactive armor), proper gun stabilization(like oh say hitting a target from 1km away while moving full speed) and other such goodies as electronic fire control and targeting computers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention ERA(explosive reactive armor), proper gun stabilization(like oh say hitting a target from 1km away while moving full speed) and other such goodies as electronic fire control and targeting computers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58714</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 04:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58714</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[They&#039;re rather less concerned about the chronological date than the *technology* you know. Which is perfectly reasonable as stuff like composite armour, smoothbores and serious FCS would quite literally &quot;change the rules&quot; - the first one would require major revision of the penetration system for example.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re rather less concerned about the chronological date than the *technology* you know. Which is perfectly reasonable as stuff like composite armour, smoothbores and serious FCS would quite literally &#8220;change the rules&#8221; &#8211; the first one would require major revision of the penetration system for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darkenedflame</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Darkenedflame]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2013 00:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1900m is almost exactly 2100 yards, so accuracy is not almost the same, it is worse.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1900m is almost exactly 2100 yards, so accuracy is not almost the same, it is worse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KyuzoS7</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58656</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KyuzoS7]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 23:47:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[put it as tier 7 for the 2nd USA med line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>put it as tier 7 for the 2nd USA med line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priory_of_Sion</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58634</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priory_of_Sion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 22:30:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for this info.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drakko</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58632</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drakko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 22:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58632</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-62A=/=T-62

The standard T-62 used a smoothbore cannon(so it could conceivably fire HEAT rounds without the bearing sleeve crap) while the T-62A variant uses a rifled gun.

In gameplay terms, a smoothbore cannon would have penetration ratings upward of 400mm so it would punch hole after hole into a Maus regardless of the maneuvers it&#039;s driver would employ.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-62A=/=T-62</p>
<p>The standard T-62 used a smoothbore cannon(so it could conceivably fire HEAT rounds without the bearing sleeve crap) while the T-62A variant uses a rifled gun.</p>
<p>In gameplay terms, a smoothbore cannon would have penetration ratings upward of 400mm so it would punch hole after hole into a Maus regardless of the maneuvers it&#8217;s driver would employ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priory_of_Sion</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58631</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priory_of_Sion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 22:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58631</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Israeli M50 &amp; M51s are known as Super Shermans, not this beast.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Israeli M50 &amp; M51s are known as Super Shermans, not this beast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58578</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 21:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hahaha former YU, 122mm armed sherman, with kv1s gun!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha former YU, 122mm armed sherman, with kv1s gun!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Priory_of_Sion</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/10/the-90-mm-and-the-m4/#comment-58410</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Priory_of_Sion]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Oct 2013 16:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=1515#comment-58410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Defeating German armor with 75/76 mm guns is still a tough job and having a 90 mm gun would make the job easier, especially in frontal engagements. 

Your reasoning is a little off.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Defeating German armor with 75/76 mm guns is still a tough job and having a 90 mm gun would make the job easier, especially in frontal engagements. </p>
<p>Your reasoning is a little off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
