<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 8.9 impressions &#8211; part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-62683</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 22:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-62683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[an autoloader with that aimtime and accuracy?

I understand its a sniper and I suppose the accuracy is fine but 1.5 aimtime?
Why not make it a little uncomfortable to shoot since it already has so much accuracy and burst potential.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an autoloader with that aimtime and accuracy?</p>
<p>I understand its a sniper and I suppose the accuracy is fine but 1.5 aimtime?<br />
Why not make it a little uncomfortable to shoot since it already has so much accuracy and burst potential.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anony</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-61877</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anony]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 17:38:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-61877</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; Everyone knows that 235 is okayish if you can hit weakspots, &quot;

Winning barely more than half your matches in WoT will put you in the 99th percentile of players.

When &quot;everyone&quot; sucks, saying &quot;everyone knows&quot; something isn&#039;t a ringing endorsement.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Everyone knows that 235 is okayish if you can hit weakspots, &#8221;</p>
<p>Winning barely more than half your matches in WoT will put you in the 99th percentile of players.</p>
<p>When &#8220;everyone&#8221; sucks, saying &#8220;everyone knows&#8221; something isn&#8217;t a ringing endorsement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hustodemon</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-61540</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hustodemon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Oct 2013 10:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-61540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[if you send 4 HE on the tank, you have a good chance to kill all crew and disabling the tank even without killing him, regardless of its armor. in theory, i mean...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if you send 4 HE on the tank, you have a good chance to kill all crew and disabling the tank even without killing him, regardless of its armor. in theory, i mean&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killercan041</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-60864</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killercan041]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 09:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-60864</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure why so many people think the gold 150 is better then the gold 128,i find the 128 to be the better gun with silver and gold ammo.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not sure why so many people think the gold 150 is better then the gold 128,i find the 128 to be the better gun with silver and gold ammo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tullus</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-60733</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tullus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 06:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-60733</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Expect a lot of noobs to grind the line for chance to play it. They will off set the unicoms&#039; scores to a great degree.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Expect a lot of noobs to grind the line for chance to play it. They will off set the unicoms&#8217; scores to a great degree.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scootaderp</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-60614</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scootaderp]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Oct 2013 01:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-60614</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having a ton of fun murdering these new td&#039;s with my invisible 155 right now, And even if they spot you all they can do is bounce rounds.  183&#039;s are doing full damage rolls everytime against them as well.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having a ton of fun murdering these new td&#8217;s with my invisible 155 right now, And even if they spot you all they can do is bounce rounds.  183&#8242;s are doing full damage rolls everytime against them as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vasileev</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-60414</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vasileev]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 22:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-60414</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The tier 9 gets better gun depression with the 15cm gun than with the 12.8cm.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tier 9 gets better gun depression with the 15cm gun than with the 12.8cm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-60320</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-60320</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[the WT E-100 is not OP. I find it&#039;s balanced (Great gun vs no armour and very long reload). Unfortunately, in good hands it can be a serial killer and might skew the stats of it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the WT E-100 is not OP. I find it&#8217;s balanced (Great gun vs no armour and very long reload). Unfortunately, in good hands it can be a serial killer and might skew the stats of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-60319</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 20:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-60319</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re just looking at the gun and screaming &quot;OP&quot; it&#039;s got things going against it that balance that out. Easy to kill due to a practically no armour turret AND a very long reload time between mags.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re just looking at the gun and screaming &#8220;OP&#8221; it&#8217;s got things going against it that balance that out. Easy to kill due to a practically no armour turret AND a very long reload time between mags.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lecso</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/12/8-9-impressions-part-2/#comment-60298</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lecso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4118#comment-60298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually 3x overmatch rule remove for HEAT is not a nerf on itself. Ricochet at higher impact angel is a buff on the other hand (to HEAT).
If 2x overmatch rule would be removed for HEAT, that would be a nerf.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually 3x overmatch rule remove for HEAT is not a nerf on itself. Ricochet at higher impact angel is a buff on the other hand (to HEAT).<br />
If 2x overmatch rule would be removed for HEAT, that would be a nerf.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
