Comments on: 8.9 Tank destroyers camo tests

By: Сравнение заметности немецких ПТ на тесте 0.8.9 | Panzer Journal

Сравнение заметности немецких ПТ на тесте 0.8.9 | Panzer Journal — Tue, 15 Oct 2013 09:02:08 +0000

[...] Источник: блог FTR. [...]

By: Kellomies

Kellomies — Mon, 14 Oct 2013 14:42:04 +0000

Far as I can tell he made one up and now tries his hardest to try and pass it off as empirical fact. Seems kinda delusional to me tbh.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 14 Oct 2013 06:41:06 +0000

ummm….type 64, chi-nu kai and T-44-85′s camo value tests?

By: commentor

commentor — Mon, 14 Oct 2013 05:17:35 +0000

By: Guardian54

Guardian54 — Mon, 14 Oct 2013 02:56:18 +0000

Where did they find this abomination of a bush able to hide the Jagdtiger, or even the whole front end, in a single bush?

By: LoserDestiny

LoserDestiny — Mon, 14 Oct 2013 02:27:08 +0000

Where have you both actually seen WT E100 camo factor? The list ends with WT PzIV.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sun, 13 Oct 2013 23:51:32 +0000

Based on this, we can assume that the WT E-100 won’t exactly have stellar camo…but it’ll be MUCH better than the JPZ E-100, which is a good thing since if you’re spotted, you’re dead in something with as little protection as the WT E-100 with such an obvious weakspot that I’m certain more people will know where to shoot a WT E-100 than a KV-5 before long.

By: T3azz (banned)

T3azz (banned) — Sun, 13 Oct 2013 22:07:00 +0000

And you realise that causes huge inbalances, when TDs are alreaddy too many according to some? We didnt need this fucking 2nd german TDs, not now when TDs are allreaddy close to be nerfed.Fix the MM system with some kind of cap, that at least balance TDs to equall amount in both teams, than adding more.

By: MrRzepa

MrRzepa — Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:32:27 +0000

Some sniper-TDs? I’m satisfied. I like that type of TDs – death from nowhere :D

By: Gryphon

Gryphon — Sun, 13 Oct 2013 17:07:31 +0000

403 Forbidden