<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Potential Hull Upgrades: Light tanks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potential Hull Upgrades: Soviet SPGs and TDs &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-84440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Potential Hull Upgrades: Soviet SPGs and TDs &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-84440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Light, Medium, and Heavy tanks are all done with, so let&#8217;s move on to the rest of the tech tree. I will be combining the two branches into one article, since the potential for extra hulls is a bit lacking on the SPG side. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Light, Medium, and Heavy tanks are all done with, so let&#8217;s move on to the rest of the tech tree. I will be combining the two branches into one article, since the potential for extra hulls is a bit lacking on the SPG side. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Potential Hull Upgrades: Soviet Medium Tanks &#124; For The Record</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-65625</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Potential Hull Upgrades: Soviet Medium Tanks &#124; For The Record]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Oct 2013 18:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-65625</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] a previous article, I explored potential hull upgrades for Soviet light tanks. Today, I will go one weight class up, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a previous article, I explored potential hull upgrades for Soviet light tanks. Today, I will go one weight class up, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnsignExpendable</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-65060</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnsignExpendable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Oct 2013 17:49:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-65060</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, that&#039;s the closest thing to a BT-5 you can get in the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, that&#8217;s the closest thing to a BT-5 you can get in the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Perfect</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-64406</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mr. Perfect]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 19:10:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-64406</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a shame. Welded hulls offering better crew protection would make for a compelling  hull upgrade on tanks that otherwise wouldn&#039;t have anything to upgrade to.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a shame. Welded hulls offering better crew protection would make for a compelling  hull upgrade on tanks that otherwise wouldn&#8217;t have anything to upgrade to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnsignExpendable</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-64131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnsignExpendable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:51:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-64131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Different types of armour behaving differently was deemed too complicated for this game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Different types of armour behaving differently was deemed too complicated for this game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EnsignExpendable</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-64130</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EnsignExpendable]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-64130</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I won&#039;t, but someone else almost certainly will. FTR has specialists for many tank nations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t, but someone else almost certainly will. FTR has specialists for many tank nations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zarax</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-64108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zarax]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 13:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-64108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s either ausf H or K, IIRC they have minor differences and a different drawing number.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s either ausf H or K, IIRC they have minor differences and a different drawing number.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sotahullu</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-64012</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sotahullu]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-64012</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well there was a concept idea that some tanks could have some RPG -style inbuild abiltities to represent some tanks qualities (like riveted armor). Not bad idea really.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well there was a concept idea that some tanks could have some RPG -style inbuild abiltities to represent some tanks qualities (like riveted armor). Not bad idea really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-64005</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bojan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-64005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US
M3 - Early model (as on Soviet M3 Light), current and M3A3 version. 1st two are cosmetic, 3rd has sloped glacis.
M5 - M5 and M5A1
M3 Medium - riveted and welded hulls.
M4 - Cast and welded hull, later has early and late version that differed with armor and slope (later was thicker but with less slope).
M4A3E8 - M4A1E8, cast hull with same suspension.
T20 - T23 hull.
M26 - M46 hull
M46 - M47 hull
T32 - later proposed hull w/o bow MG.
M103 - M103A2 hull, which would bring diesel engine.
M10 - M10A1 and M10A2 hulls
M36 - either M36B1 (M4A3 hull) or M36B2 hull.
M18 - post war suspension based on Chaffee tracks.

French:
H-35 - H-39 hull
B1 - either original B1 or B1ter hull.
BDR G1B - hull from other BDR project and rename it to just G1.
AMX M4 (1945) - there were later proposals on this chassis, but if they will be hull upgrades or separate tank none knows ATM (other then possible devs).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US<br />
M3 &#8211; Early model (as on Soviet M3 Light), current and M3A3 version. 1st two are cosmetic, 3rd has sloped glacis.<br />
M5 &#8211; M5 and M5A1<br />
M3 Medium &#8211; riveted and welded hulls.<br />
M4 &#8211; Cast and welded hull, later has early and late version that differed with armor and slope (later was thicker but with less slope).<br />
M4A3E8 &#8211; M4A1E8, cast hull with same suspension.<br />
T20 &#8211; T23 hull.<br />
M26 &#8211; M46 hull<br />
M46 &#8211; M47 hull<br />
T32 &#8211; later proposed hull w/o bow MG.<br />
M103 &#8211; M103A2 hull, which would bring diesel engine.<br />
M10 &#8211; M10A1 and M10A2 hulls<br />
M36 &#8211; either M36B1 (M4A3 hull) or M36B2 hull.<br />
M18 &#8211; post war suspension based on Chaffee tracks.</p>
<p>French:<br />
H-35 &#8211; H-39 hull<br />
B1 &#8211; either original B1 or B1ter hull.<br />
BDR G1B &#8211; hull from other BDR project and rename it to just G1.<br />
AMX M4 (1945) &#8211; there were later proposals on this chassis, but if they will be hull upgrades or separate tank none knows ATM (other then possible devs).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bojan</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/18/potential-hull-upgrades-light-tanks/#comment-63997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[bojan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2013 11:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4370#comment-63997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Both IS-85 and IS-122 (IS-1 and IS-2 designations only appeared in early 1945) had stepped front version as on Soviet IS in game. IS-122 was produced with &quot;straightened&quot; glacis since 2nd half 1944., thickness was 100mm cast or 90mm RHA (later version is on Chinese IS-2 in game).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Both IS-85 and IS-122 (IS-1 and IS-2 designations only appeared in early 1945) had stepped front version as on Soviet IS in game. IS-122 was produced with &#8220;straightened&#8221; glacis since 2nd half 1944., thickness was 100mm cast or 90mm RHA (later version is on Chinese IS-2 in game).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
