<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 21.10.2013</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyb377</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-67208</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cyb377]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Oct 2013 11:54:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-67208</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; the fact you disable the encounter and assault modes has no influence on map selection &quot;

Really surprising. 
I removed both encounter and assault modes because I was bored playing every time the same sand river / erlenberg / el halluf maps.
As soon as I removed these two modes, I was able to fight on maps unseen for days.

I really think the map selection choose first the mode, and after then the map. This should explain the missing maps for days because they are only elligible on normal mode, while sand river is available in the three modes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; the fact you disable the encounter and assault modes has no influence on map selection &#8221;</p>
<p>Really surprising.<br />
I removed both encounter and assault modes because I was bored playing every time the same sand river / erlenberg / el halluf maps.<br />
As soon as I removed these two modes, I was able to fight on maps unseen for days.</p>
<p>I really think the map selection choose first the mode, and after then the map. This should explain the missing maps for days because they are only elligible on normal mode, while sand river is available in the three modes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66814</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66814</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nah, it&#039;s a rack at the back of the turret. The two loaders&#039; job then being to keep *that* stocked up... probably not exactly the most optimal way to use manpower but eh. :/
http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/77814-is-7s-autoloader/page__pid__1237987#entry1237987]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, it&#8217;s a rack at the back of the turret. The two loaders&#8217; job then being to keep *that* stocked up&#8230; probably not exactly the most optimal way to use manpower but eh. :/<br />
<a href="http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/77814-is-7s-autoloader/page__pid__1237987#entry1237987" rel="nofollow">http://forum.worldoftanks.com/index.php?/topic/77814-is-7s-autoloader/page__pid__1237987#entry1237987</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 19:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*whooooooosh*

That was the point, sailing by somewhere far above your head.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*whooooooosh*</p>
<p>That was the point, sailing by somewhere far above your head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pile of Pooh</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66776</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pile of Pooh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;122mm U-11 was not proposed for KV-2, it’s in the game as a stock gun for balance reasons&quot;

That&#039;s nice.  Then put the 75/L43 on the DouchebagWagen and quit quacking about &quot;historicity.&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;122mm U-11 was not proposed for KV-2, it’s in the game as a stock gun for balance reasons&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s nice.  Then put the 75/L43 on the DouchebagWagen and quit quacking about &#8220;historicity.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pile of Pooh</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66773</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pile of Pooh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 17:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Carousel type, perhaps?  I got to fire the gun on a BMP-1 in Czech a couple decades back.  Carousel type shell rack around the turret with a mechanical loading arm.  Keep your right elbow tucked in REAL tight when you push that red button or it&#039;ll load your arm into the breech.  Hope you don&#039;t have wide shoulders...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carousel type, perhaps?  I got to fire the gun on a BMP-1 in Czech a couple decades back.  Carousel type shell rack around the turret with a mechanical loading arm.  Keep your right elbow tucked in REAL tight when you push that red button or it&#8217;ll load your arm into the breech.  Hope you don&#8217;t have wide shoulders&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66739</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66739</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Er, T7.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Er, T7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66738</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 16:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T-43 can mount the D5T. Pretty much end of discussion as far as I&#039;m concerned, having &#039;enjoyed&#039; myself immensely with the KV-13 stock grind in the past and given that all the 44-85 has going for itself in return is somewhat better frontal protection and agility than the T-43 boasts.
...and since when could T7 Soviets fit V-Stabs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T-43 can mount the D5T. Pretty much end of discussion as far as I&#8217;m concerned, having &#8216;enjoyed&#8217; myself immensely with the KV-13 stock grind in the past and given that all the 44-85 has going for itself in return is somewhat better frontal protection and agility than the T-43 boasts.<br />
&#8230;and since when could T7 Soviets fit V-Stabs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66588</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 13:20:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like, and do very well with the pantherm10. 64%wr solopubbin mostly and kastery badge. Fun tank]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like, and do very well with the pantherm10. 64%wr solopubbin mostly and kastery badge. Fun tank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66532</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 12:03:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In carrying the historical design&#039;s original S-53 PoS?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In carrying the historical design&#8217;s original S-53 PoS?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kellomies</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/21/21-10-2013/#comment-66527</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kellomies]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Oct 2013 11:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4472#comment-66527</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;d basically be the D5T gun found in the KV-13 and T-43. Thing is the 44-85 is supposed to carry the rather shittier S-53 instead.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;d basically be the D5T gun found in the KV-13 and T-43. Thing is the 44-85 is supposed to carry the rather shittier S-53 instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
