<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Big Bad 128mm</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:08:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-69483</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Robin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:45:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-69483</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Silentstalker i am not sure if Brandgeschosse are really tracer rounds, since tracer rounds are normally called Leuchtspurgeschosse in German and Brandgeschosse are more likely to mean incendiary rounds.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Silentstalker i am not sure if Brandgeschosse are really tracer rounds, since tracer rounds are normally called Leuchtspurgeschosse in German and Brandgeschosse are more likely to mean incendiary rounds.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-69279</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 20:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-69279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This idea is stupid as it sound . 

Ultimate sniper ? Pls , the Waffentragger E-100 with its autoloader 12.8 have good acc and it comes with 6 shells already . 

320 mm of penetration is not a good bargain .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This idea is stupid as it sound . </p>
<p>Ultimate sniper ? Pls , the Waffentragger E-100 with its autoloader 12.8 have good acc and it comes with 6 shells already . </p>
<p>320 mm of penetration is not a good bargain .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Takeda</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-69264</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Takeda]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 19:35:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-69264</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[a question.. will we have more german medium branches and not just TDs? (as in, are there any german tank, wither real or prototypes left to implement?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a question.. will we have more german medium branches and not just TDs? (as in, are there any german tank, wither real or prototypes left to implement?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ChielScape</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-69212</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ChielScape]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:24:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-69212</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;What if the vehicle has a small crew
Yeah, what if. Except no 128mm gun vehicle ever has a small crew.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;What if the vehicle has a small crew<br />
Yeah, what if. Except no 128mm gun vehicle ever has a small crew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-69204</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 17:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-69204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&gt;12,8mm FlaK 45 (PaK 45): DAM: 560/560/700 PEN: 285/380/70 Acc: 0,28 Aim: 2,7 ROF: 4,46

but isn&#039;t this basically just a more accurate ISU? What the russians get at tier 8 the germans have to wait for tier 10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;12,8mm FlaK 45 (PaK 45): DAM: 560/560/700 PEN: 285/380/70 Acc: 0,28 Aim: 2,7 ROF: 4,46</p>
<p>but isn&#8217;t this basically just a more accurate ISU? What the russians get at tier 8 the germans have to wait for tier 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daigensui</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-69131</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daigensui]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 15:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-69131</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m working on the third and fourth lines. Problem?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m working on the third and fourth lines. Problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Foxtrott</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-68997</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Foxtrott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-68997</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nice one, I totally agree. And the damage=balance reminder should acompany most of your posts ;)

In the end that would be the TD I &quot;expected&quot; to be playing in any TD line... As reality is different it is the kind of TD I&#039;d love to play ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice one, I totally agree. And the damage=balance reminder should acompany most of your posts ;)</p>
<p>In the end that would be the TD I &#8220;expected&#8221; to be playing in any TD line&#8230; As reality is different it is the kind of TD I&#8217;d love to play ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drakko</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-68988</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Drakko]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:25:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-68988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[DU has pyrophoric properties from the get go. DU is highly toxic and reactive from a chemical(not radioactive) standpoint.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DU has pyrophoric properties from the get go. DU is highly toxic and reactive from a chemical(not radioactive) standpoint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ethan_</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-68982</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ethan_]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-68982</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah sure iknow it was one of the most powerfull guns during WWII but i didn&#039;t suspect such effects. Photographic footage helped me realise.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah sure iknow it was one of the most powerfull guns during WWII but i didn&#8217;t suspect such effects. Photographic footage helped me realise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captian Nemo</title>
		<link>http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/25/the-big-bad-128mm/#comment-68977</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Captian Nemo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Oct 2013 14:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ftr.wot-news.com/?p=4551#comment-68977</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FlaK 40 12.8cm. The gun fired a 27.9 kg (57.2-pound) shell at 880 m/s (2,890 ft/s) to a maximum ceiling of 14,800 m (48,556 ft). Compared with the 88mm FlaK 18 &amp; 36, the 128 used a powder charge four times as great which resulted in a shell flight time only one-third as long. This made aim against fast-moving targets much easier.
.
a almost 60 lb shell doing almost 3k fps... I suspect it will have an impact.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FlaK 40 12.8cm. The gun fired a 27.9 kg (57.2-pound) shell at 880 m/s (2,890 ft/s) to a maximum ceiling of 14,800 m (48,556 ft). Compared with the 88mm FlaK 18 &amp; 36, the 128 used a powder charge four times as great which resulted in a shell flight time only one-third as long. This made aim against fast-moving targets much easier.<br />
.<br />
a almost 60 lb shell doing almost 3k fps&#8230; I suspect it will have an impact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
